Neuroimage ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A Large-Scale ENIGMA Multisite Replication Study of Brain Age in Depression
Laura K. M. HaniD, Richard DingaiD, Ramona LeeningsiD, Tim HahniD, James Howard ColeiD, Lyubomir I. AftanasiD, Alyssa R. AmodiD, Bianca BesteheriD, Romain ColleiD, Emmanuelle CorrubleiD, Baptiste Couvy‐DuchesneiD, Konstantin V. DanilenkoiD, Paola Fuentes‐ClaramonteiD, Ali Saffet GönüliD, Ian H. GotlibiD, Roberto Goya‐MaldonadoiD, Nynke A. GroenewoldiD, J. Paul HamiltoniD, Naho IchikawaiD, Jonathan IpseriD, Eri Itai, Sheri‐Michelle KoopowitziD, Meng LiiD, Go OkadaiD, Yasumasa OkamotoiD, , Lianne SchmaaliD
Abstract
BackgroundSeveral studies have evaluated whether depressed persons have older appearing brains than their nondepressed peers. However, the estimated neuroimaging-derived "brain age gap" has varied from study to study, likely driven by differences in training and testing sample (size), age range, and used modality/features. To validate our previously developed ENIGMA brain age model and the identified brain age gap, we aim to replicate the presence and effect size estimate previously found in the largest study in depression to date (N=2,126 controls & N=2,675 cases; +1.08 years [SE 0.22], Cohens d=0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20), in independent cohorts that were not part of the original study. MethodsA previously trained brain age model (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage) based on 77 FreeSurfer brain regions of interest was used to obtain unbiased brain age predictions in 751 controls and 766 persons with depression (18-75 years) from 13 new cohorts collected from 20 different scanners. ResultsOur ENIGMA MDD brain age model generalized reasonably well to controls from the new cohorts (predicted age vs. age: r = 0.73, R2=0.47, MAE=7.50 years), although the performance varied from cohort to cohort. In these new cohorts, on average, depressed persons showed a significantly higher brain age gap of +1 year (SE 0.35) (Cohens d{square}={square}{square}.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.25) compared with controls, highly similar to our previous finding. ConclusionsThis study further validates our previously developed ENIGMA brain age algorithm. Importantly, we replicated the brain age gap in depression with a comparable effect size. Thus, two large-scale independent mega-analyses across in total 32 cohorts and >3,400 patients and >2,800 controls worldwide show reliable but subtle effects of brain aging in adult depression.
- Citations
- 27
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain Aging in Major Depressive Disorder: Results from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group
Laura K. M. Han, Richard Dinga, … Janice M. Fullerton·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- Lifestyle, Early-life, and Genetic Health Risk Factors Underlying the Brain Age Gap: A Mega-Analysis Across 3,934 Individuals from the ENIGMA MDD Consortium
Laura K. M. Han, Yara Jo Toenders, … Lianne Schmaal·bioRxiv·May 9, 2025
- Neurologically altered brain activity may not look like aged brain activity: Implications for brain-age modeling and biomarker strategies
Lukas A. W. Gemein, Sinead Gaubert, … Denis Alexander Engemann·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2025
- Brain Age in Conduct Disorder: A Mega-Analysis of the ENIGMA Antisocial Behavior Working Group
Jules Roger Dugre, Yidian Gao, … Stéphane A. De Brito·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- Statistical Pitfalls in Brain Age Analyses
Ellyn R. Butler, Andrew A. Chen, … Russell Taki Shinohara·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2020
- Replication and Refinement of Brain Age Model for adolescent development.
Bhaskar Ray, Jiayu Chen, … Jingyu Liu·IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Peer-reviewed·May 27, 2024