CAFT: A Compositional Log-Linear Model for Microbiome Data with Zero Cells
Abstract
BackgroundDifferential abundance analysis is fundamental to microbiome research and provides valuable insights into host-microbe interactions. However, microbiome data are compositional, highly sparse (with many zero counts), and influenced by differential experimental biases across taxa. Standard statistical methods often overlook these features. Many approaches analyze relative abundances without accounting for compositionality or rely on pseudocounts, potentially leading to spurious associations and inadequate false discovery rate (FDR) control. MethodsWe introduce a novel framework for differential abundance analysis of microbiome data: the Compositional Accelerated Failure Time (CAFT) model. CAFT addresses zero read counts by treating them as censored observations that are below a detection limit. This approach is inherently resistant to multiplicative technical bias, eliminates the need for pseudocounts, and addresses compositional bias through the establishment of appropriate score test procedures. ResultsExtensive simulations show that CAFT outperforms competing compositional differential abundance methods, including LOCOM, LinDA, ANCOM-BC2, its robust variant, and LDM-clr by offering more robust type I error and FDR control with or without technical bias. Additionally, we applied CAFT to microbiome data on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the upper respiratory tract (URT) to identify differentially abundant gut microbial taxa between IBD patients and healthy controls, as well as URT taxa distinguishing smokers from non-smokers. ConclusionWe present CAFT, a powerful, robust, and efficient approach for compositional differential abundance analysis. CAFT effectively controls Type I error and maintains FDR control, while demonstrating enhanced power in statistical testing. These capabilities render CAFT a useful tool for compositional microbiome data analysis. Availability and implementationThe R package and Vignette are available at https://github.com/mli171/CAFT.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- LOCOM: A logistic regression model for testing differential abundance in compositional microbiome data with false discovery rate control
Yingtian Hu, Glen A. Satten, Yi‐Juan Hu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2022
- Impact of experimental bias on compositional analysis of microbiome data
Yingtian Hu, Glen A. Satten, Yi-Juan Hu·GenesPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2023
- Multi-scale Adaptive Differential Abundance Analysis in Microbial Compositional Data
Shulei Wang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2023
- Understanding the bias of compositional microbiome differential abundance estimation
M. Luz Calle, Meritxell Pujolassos, Antonio Susín·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- Zero is not absence: censoring-based differential abundance analysis for microbiome data
L. S. Chan, G. Li·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2023
- A Permutation-Based Framework for Evaluating Bias in Microbiome Differential Abundance Analysis
Ke Zeng, Anthony A. Fodor·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026