Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Resting-state aperiodic neural activity as a novel objective marker of daytime somnolence

Zachariah R. CrossiD, T Kang, Kurt LushingtoniD, Paroma Sarkar, Parmjit SinghiD, Sonya Johnston, Aeneas YeoiD, Alex ChatburniD

Abstract

Study ObjectivesCurrent assessment of excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) requires subjective measurements such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and/or resource intensive sleep laboratory investigations. Recent work 1,2 has called for more non-performance-based measures of EDS. One promising non-performance-based measure of EDS is the aperiodic component of electroencephalography (EEG). Aperiodic (non-oscillatory) activity reflects excitation/inhibition ratios of neural populations and is altered in various states of consciousness, and thus may be a potential biomarker of hypersomnolence. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed EEG data from patients who underwent a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and determined whether aperiodic neural activity is predictive of EDS. Participants having undergone laboratory polysomnogram and next day MSLT were grouped into MSLT+ (n = 26) and MSLT- (n = 33) groups (mean sleep latency of 10min, respectively) and compared against a non-clinical (Control) group of participants (n = 26). ResultsWhile the MSLT+ and MSLT- groups did not differ in their aperiodic activity, the Control group had a significantly flatter slope and larger offset compared to both MSLT+ and MSLT- groups. Logistic regression machine learning predicted group status (i.e., symptomatic, non-symptomatic) with 90% accuracy based on the aperiodic slope while controlling for age. Slow oscillation-spindle coupling was also significantly stronger in the Control group relative to MSLT+ and MSLT- groups. ConclusionsOur results provide first evidence that aperiodic neural dynamics and sleep-based cross-frequency coupling is predictive of EDS, thereby providing a novel avenue for basic and applied research in the study of sleepiness.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.