How does the presence of neural probes affect extracellular potentials?
Alessio Paolo BuccinoiD, Miroslav KuchtaiD, Karoline Horgmo JægeriD, Torbjørn V. NessiD, Pierre BerthetiD, Kent‐André MardaliD, Gert CauwenberghsiD, Aslak TveitoiD
Abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSMechanistic modeling of neurons is an essential component of computational neuroscience that enables scientists to simulate, explain, and explore neural activity. The conventional approach to simulation of extracellular neural recordings first computes transmembrane currents using the cable equation and then sums their contribution to model the extracellular potential. This two-step approach relies on the assumption that the extracellular space is an infinite and homogeneous conductive medium, while measurements are performed using neural probes. The main purpose of this paper is to assess to what extent the presence of the neural probes of varying shape and size impacts the extracellular field and how to correct for them.\n\nApproachWe apply a detailed modeling framework allowing explicit representation of the neuron and the probe to study the effect of the probes and thereby estimate the effect of ignoring it. We use meshes with simplified neurons and different types of probe and compare the extracellular action potentials with and without the probe in the extracellular space. We then compare various solutions to account for the probes presence and introduce an efficient probe correction method to include the probe effect in modeling of extracellular potentials.\n\nMain resultsOur computations show that microwires hardly influence the extracellular electric field and their effect can therefore be ignored. In contrast, Multi-Electrode Arrays (MEAs) significantly affect the extracellular field by magnifying the recorded potential. While MEAs behave similarly to infinite insulated planes, we find that their effect strongly depends on the neuron-probe alignment and probe orientation.\n\nSignificanceIgnoring the probe effect might be deleterious in some applications, such as neural localization and parameterization of neural models from extracellular recordings. Moreover, the presence of the probe can improve the interpretation of extracellular recordings, by providing a more accurate estimation of the extracellular potential generated by neuronal models.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measuring Neuronal Signals with Microelectrode Arrays: A Finite Element Analysis
R. Bestel, U. van Rienen, … R. Appali·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2020
- Extracellular Stimulation and Ephaptic Coupling of Neurons in a Fully Coupled Finite Element-Based Extracellular-Membrane-Intracellular (EMI) Model
Karoline Horgmo Jæger, Aslak Tveito·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2026
- Single pointwise samples of electric field on a neuron model cannot predict activation threshold by brain stimulation
Boshuo Wang, Minhaj A. Hussain, … Angel V. Peterchev·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- BlueRecording: A Pipeline for the efficient calculation of extracellular recordings in large-scale neural circuit models
Joseph Tharayil, Jorge Blanco Alonso, … Michael Reimann·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2025
- jULIEs: extracellular probes for recordings and stimulation in the structurally and functionally intact mouse brain
Romeo Rácz, Mihály Köllő, … Andreas T. Schaefer·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2019
- Enabling Electric Field Model of Microscopically Realistic Brain
Zhen Qi, Gregory M. Noetscher, … Sergey N Makaroff·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2024