Life Science AllianceBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
CellMixS: quantifying and visualizing batch effects in single cell RNA-seq data
Almut LuetgeiD, Joanna Zyprych-WalczakiD, Urszula Brykczynska Kunzmann, Helena Lucia CrowelliD, Daniela Calini, Dheeraj MalhotraiD, Charlotte SonesoniD, Mark D. RobinsoniD
Abstract
A key challenge in single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis are dataset- and batch-specific differences that can obscure the biological signal of interest. While there are various tools and methods to perform data integration and correct for batch effects, their performance can vary between datasets and according to the nature of the bias. Therefore, it is important to understand how batch effects manifest in order to adjust for them in a reliable way. Here, we systematically explore batch effects in a variety of scRNA-seq datasets according to magnitude, cell type specificity and complexity. We developed a cell-specific mixing score (cms) that quantifies how well cells from multiple batches are mixed. By considering distance distributions (in a lower dimensional space), the score is able to detect local batch bias and differentiate between unbalanced batches (i.e., when one cell type is more abundant in a batch) and systematic differences between cells of the same cell type. We implemented cms and related metrics to detect batch effects or measure structure preservation in the CellMixS R/Bioconductor package. We systematically compare different metrics that have been proposed to quantify batch effects or bias in scRNA-seq data using real datasets with known batch effects and synthetic data that mimic various real data scenarios. While these metrics target the same question and are used interchangeably, we find differences in inter- and intra-dataset scalability, sensitivity and in a metrics ability to handle batch effects with differentially abundant cell types. We find that cell-specific metrics outperform cell type-specific and global metrics and recommend them for both method benchmarks and batch exploration.
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 58
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data Matrix Normalization and Merging Strategies Minimize Batch-specific Systemic Variation in scRNA-Seq Data
Benjamin R. Babcock, Astrid Kosters, … Eliver Ghosn·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2021
- A Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Batch Integration Metrics and sBEE, A New Metric
Mekan Myradov, Aissa Houdjedj, … Hilal Kazan·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- Correcting batch effects in single-cell RNA sequencing data by matching mutual nearest neighbours.
Laleh Haghverdi, Aaron T. L. Lun, … John C. Marioni·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2018
- scRNA-seq mixology: towards better benchmarking of single cell RNA-seq analysis methods
Luyi Tian, Xueyi Dong, … Matthew E. Ritchie·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2019
- BATMAN: fast and accurate integration of single-cell RNA-Seq datasets via minimum-weight matching
Igor Mandric, Brian L. Hill, … Eran Halperin·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 20, 2020
- SMNN: Batch Effect Correction for Single-cell RNA-seq data via Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Detection
Yuchen Yang, Gang Li, … Yun Li·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2020