Brain Structure and FunctionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic bias in surface area asymmetry measurements from automatic cortical parcellations
Abstract
Anatomical asymmetry is a hallmark of the human brain and may reflect hemispheric differences in its functional organization. Widely used software like FreeSurfer can automate neuroanatomical measurements and facilitate studies of hemispheric asymmetry. However, patterns of surface area lateralization measured using FreeSurfer are curiously consistent across diverse samples. Here, we demonstrate systematic biases in these measurements obtained from the default processing pipeline. We compared surface area asymmetry measured from reconstructions of original brains vs. the same scans after flipping their left-right orientation. The default pipeline returned implausible asymmetry patterns between the original and flipped brains: Many structures were always left- or right-lateralized. Notably, these biases occur prominently in key speech and language regions. In contrast, manual labeling and curvature-based parcellations of key structures both yielded the expected reversals of left/right lateralization in flipped brains. We determined that these biases result from discrepancies in how regional labels are defined in the left vs. right hemisphere in the default cortical parcellation atlases. These biases are carried into individual parcellations because the FreeSurfer parcellation algorithm prioritizes vertex correspondence to the template atlas relative to individual neuroanatomical variation. We further demonstrate several straightforward, bias-free approaches to measuring surface area asymmetry, including using symmetric registration templates and parcellation atlases, vertex-wise analyses, and within-subject curvature-based parcellations. These results highlight theoretical concerns about using only the default processing stream to make inferences about population-level brain asymmetry and underscore the need for validating bias-free neuroanatomical measurements, particularly when studying regions where structural lateralization may underlie functional lateralization.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 17th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Asymmetry Map of Human Brain in Young Adults
Maryam Malekzadeh, Alireza Kashani·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2020
- Mapping Cortical Brain Asymmetry in 17,141 Healthy Individuals Worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium
Xiangzhen Kong, Samuel R. Mathias, … Susanne Walitza·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2018
- Structural Directional Brain Behavior Asymmetry Across Cortical and Non-Cortical Regions
Fatemeh Hashemi, Hadis Momtaz, … Alireza Kashani·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2026
- Charting structural brain asymmetry across the human lifespan
Lena Dorfschmidt, Simon Richard White, … Aaron F. Alexander‐Bloch·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2025
- The individuality of shape asymmetries of the human cerebral cortex
Yu‐Chi Chen, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2022
- Left-Right Brain-Wide Asymmetry of Neuroanatomy in the Mouse Brain
Andrew Silberfeld, James M. Roe, … Olivier Pourquié·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2025