Sign in
NeuroscienceNature Human Behaviour
Peer-reviewed journal article

Indecision and recency-weighted evidence integration in non-clinical and clinical settings

Magdalena del RíoiD, Nadescha TrudeliD, Gita PrabhuiD, Laurence Tudor HuntiD, Michael MoutoussisiD, Raymond J. DolaniD, Tobias U. HauseriD

Abstract

Biases in information gathering are common in the general population and can reach pathological extremes in paralysing indecisiveness, as in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Here, we adopt a new perspective on information gathering and demonstrate an information integration bias where most recent information is over-weighted by means of evidence strength updates ({Delta}ES). In a large, crowd-sourced sample (N=5,237), we find reduced {Delta}ES-weighting drives indecisiveness along an OC spectrum. We replicate the attenuated {Delta}ES- weighting in a second lab-based study (N=105) that includes a transdiagnostic OC spectrum encompassing OCD and generalised anxiety patients. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we trace {Delta}ES signals to a late neural signal peaking around 920 ms. Critically, high-OC participants show an attenuated neural {Delta}ES signal in medio-frontal areas while other decision- relevant processes remain intact. Our findings establish biased information-weighting as a key driver of information gathering, where attenuated {Delta}ES can lead to indecisiveness across an OC spectrum.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAbdelrazik '26Yang '19Kadri '26Talluri '21Kaanders '22Hauser '18
69% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ahmed H. Abdelrazik, Peter Dayan·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026