NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Spontaneous network activity <35 Hz accounts for variability in stimulus-induced gamma responses
Jan V. HirschmanniD, Sylvain BailletiD, Mark W. WoolrichiD, Alfons SchnitzleriD, Diego VidaurreiD, Esther FloriniD
Abstract
Gamma range activity in human visual cortex is believed to play a major role in cognitive functions, such as selective attention. Although recent studies have revealed substantial variability in gamma activity, its origins are still unclear.\n\nWe investigated whether variability in stimulus-induced gamma activity is related to the spontaneous dynamics of resting-state networks using Hidden Markov Modelling. The magnetoencephalogram (MEG) of 15 healthy participants was recorded at rest and while they were performing a task involving a visual stimulus inducing strong, narrow-band gamma activity. Brain states were inferred from the tasks baseline periods and from resting-state recordings, respectively.\n\nOur results show how network states are related to the amplitude of stimulus-induced gamma responses. Across trials, we found an association between the amplitude of gamma responses and the brain state occurring immediately prior to stimulus presentation. Strong gamma responses followed a state characterized by prominent delta/theta oscillations in parieto-occipital regions and comparably weak alpha activity. Across subjects, the overall probability of visiting this state in the baseline period, i.e. the individual preference for this state, correlated positively with the amplitude of the trial-averaged gamma response. Remarkably, this relationship persisted when states were inferred from resting-state recordings rather than the tasks baseline.\n\nIn summary, both within- and across-subject variability in stimulus-induced gamma activity can in part be explained by the ongoing dynamics of whole-brain network states. Fast, pre-stimulus modulations of brain states account for differences between trials while stable, individual state preferences account for differences between subjects.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Flexible perceptual encoding by discrete gamma events
Quentin Perrenoud, Antonio H. de O. Fonseca, … Jessica A. Cardin·NaturePeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2025
- Stimulus-induced Gamma Power Predicts the Amplitude of the Subsequent Visual Evoked Response
Mats W.J. van Es, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2018
- Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brain-wide population activity
Carsen Stringer, Marius Pachitariu, … Kenneth D. Harris·SciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2019
- Alpha oscillations, criticality and responsiveness in complex brain networks
Minkyung Kim, UnCheol Lee·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2019
- Integration, coincidence detection and resonance in networks of spiking neurons expressing gamma oscillations and asynchronous states
Eduarda Susin, Alain Destexhe A·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2021
- Responsiveness of cerebral cortex to hippocampal inputs depends on brain region and brain state
Fayçal Rezaig, Wyna Gagliano, … Alain Destexhe A·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026