Network medicine-based epistasis detection in complex diseases: ready for quantum computing
Markus HoffmanniD, Julian PoschenriederiD, Massimiliano IncudiniiD, Sylvie BaieriD, Amelie FritziD, Andreas MaieriD, Michael HartungiD, Christian HoffmanniD, Nico TrummeriD, Klaudia AdamowicziD, Mario PiccianiiD, Evelyn Scheibling, Maximilian V. HarliD, Ingmar Lesch, Hunor Frey, Simon Kayser, Paul Wissenberg, Leon SchwartziD, Leon HafneriD, Aakriti Acharya, Lena Maria HackliD, Gordon GrabertiD, Sung‐Gwon LeeiD, Gyuhyeok ChoiD, Matthew E. ClowardiD, , David B. BlumenthaliD
Abstract
Most heritable diseases are polygenic. To comprehend the underlying genetic architecture, it is crucial to discover the clinically relevant epistatic interactions (EIs) between genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)1-3. Existing statistical computational methods for EI detection are mostly limited to pairs of SNPs due to the combinatorial explosion of higher-order EIs. With NeEDL (network-based epistasis detection via local search), we leverage network medicine to inform the selection of EIs that are an order of magnitude more statistically significant compared to existing tools and consist, on average, of five SNPs. We further show that this computationally demanding task can be substantially accelerated once quantum computing hardware becomes available. We apply NeEDL to eight different diseases and discover genes (affected by EIs of SNPs) that are partly known to affect the disease, additionally, these results are reproducible across independent cohorts. EIs for these eight diseases can be interactively explored in the Epistasis Disease Atlas (https://epistasis-disease-atlas.com). In summary, NeEDL is the first application that demonstrates the potential of seamlessly integrated quantum computing techniques to accelerate biomedical research. Our network medicine approach detects higher-order EIs with unprecedented statistical and biological evidence, yielding unique insights into polygenic diseases and providing a basis for the development of improved risk scores and combination therapies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BitEpi: A Fast and Accurate Exhaustive Higher-Order Epistasis Search
Arash Bayat, Brendan Hosking, … Denis C. Bauer·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2021
- Interpretable network-guided epistasis detection
Diane Duroux, Héctor Climente-González, … Kristel Van Steen·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Data-Driven Symbolic Higher-Order Epistasis Discovery with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks
Oankar R. Patil, Kamran Shazand, … May D. Wang·ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB)Peer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2025
- Novel Methods for Epistasis Detection in Genome-Wide Association Studies
Lotfi Slim, Clément Chatelain, … Jean‐Philippe Vert·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2020
- Detecting Genetic Interactions with Visible Neural Networks
Arno van Hilten, Federico Melograna, … Gennady V. Roshchupkin·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2025
- Evaluation of epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes
Stanislav Listopad, Gauri Renjith, Qian Peng·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2026