bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Patterns, predictors, and consequences of dominance in hybrids
K. A. Thompson, M. Urquhart-Cronish, K. D. Whitney, L. H. Rieseberg, D. Schluter
Abstract
Are first-generation (F1) hybrids typically intermediate for all traits that differentiate their parents? Or are they similar to one parent for most traits, or even mismatched for divergent traits? Although the phenotype of otherwise viable and fertile hybrids determines their fate, little is known about the general patterns, predictors, and consequences of phenotype expression in hybrids. To address this empirical gap, we compiled data from nearly 200 studies where traits were measured in a common environment for two parent populations and F1 hybrids. We find that individual traits are typically halfway between the parental midpoint and one parental value (i.e., hybrid trait values are typically 0.25 or 0.75 if parents values are 0 & 1). When considering pairs of traits together, a hybrids multivariate phenotype tends to resemble one parent (pairwise parent-bias) about 50 % more than the other while also exhibiting a similar magnitude of trait mismatch due to different traits having dominance in conflicting directions. We detect no phylogenetic signal nor an effect of parental genetic distance on dominance or mismatch. Using data from an experimental field planting of recombinant hybrid sunflowers--where there is among-individual variation in dominance and mismatch due to segregation of divergent alleles--we illustrate that pairwise parent-bias improves fitness while mismatch reduces fitness. Importantly, the effect of mismatch on fitness was stronger than that of pairwise parent-bias. In sum, our study has three major conclusions. First, hybrids between ecologically divergent natural populations are typically not phenotypically intermediate but rather exhibit substantial mismatch while also resembling one parent more than the other. Second, dominance and mismatch are likely determined by population-specific processes rather than general rules. Finally, selection against hybrids likely results from both selection against somewhat intermediate phenotypes and against mismatched trait combinations.
- organism: multiple species
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness
H. Schneemann, A. D. Munzur, … J. J. Welch·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2021
- The influence of incompatibilities and heterosis on hybrid population genetics
Julio A Ayala-Lopez, Stephan Peischl, Claudia Bank·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- The Geometry and Genetics of Hybridization
H. Schneemann, B. De Sanctis, … J. J. Welch·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2020
- Predicting Hybrid Fitness: the Effects of Ploidy and Complex Ancestry
Hilde Schneemann, John J. Welch·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2025
- Fitness of reciprocal F1 hybrids between Rhinanthus minor and Rhinanthus major under controlled conditions and in the field
R. A. Wesselingh, S. Horcicova, K. Mirzaei·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2018
- Adaptive divergence and the evolution of hybrid trait mismatch in threespine stickleback
A. K. Chhina, K. A. Thompson, D. Schluter·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2020