Electrode position, distance, size, and orientation determine efficacy of cervical epidural stimulation to recruit forelimb muscles in rats
Andrés Pascual-LeoneiD, Vishweshwar TyagiiD, Ahmet S. AsaniD, Pedro Emanuel Rocha-FloresiD, Ovidio Rodríguez-LopeziD, Walter E. VoitiD, James R. McIntoshiD, Jason B. CarmeliD
Abstract
Target engagement determines therapeutic efficacy. In spinal cord stimulation (SCS), efficacy depends on the attributes of the electrodes used to deliver stimulation, particularly their position, interelectrode distance, size, and current orientation. We tested the effects of these electrode parameters using cervical stimulation to elicit forelimb muscle responses in the rat. We implanted devices over the C6 dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) in eight rats and measured responses in six forelimb muscles. We used custom designed electrode arrays to systematically vary position, distance, and size with linear arrays, and current orientation with circular arrays. Stimulation consisted of biphasic and pseudomonophasic pulse shapes with bipolar or distant return, and a high-definition montage with four returns surrounding a central contact to increase local current density. Efficacy was calculated from the motor thresholds of recruitment curves, and parameters were compared using linear mixed models. For position, stimulation over the DREZ was most effective, reducing thresholds by 25.9% (p = 0.0002) relative to the midline; efficacy decreased as the electrode was positioned medial or lateral to the DREZ. For distance, placing the electrodes farther apart significantly improved efficacy (p = 0.0022). For size, large electrodes increased SCS efficacy, reducing thresholds by 21.5% (p = 0.0026) relative to small electrodes. After accounting for position and distance, current orientation did not affect SCS efficacy. Lastly, the high-definition montage decreased efficacy, increasing thresholds by 16.7% (p = 0.003) relative to monopolar stimulation with a distant return. In conclusion, electrode position, distance, and size had the greatest effect on SCS efficacy, with the optimal parameters combining large electrodes at the DREZ position with a distant return. These results have the potential to lower the current needed to engage cervical spinal circuitry and to inform the design of SCS systems to improve dexterity in people with neurological injury or disease.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the human dorsal spinal cord reveals a map of arm and hand muscle responses
James R. McIntosh, Evan F. Joiner, … Jason B. Carmel·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2022
- Selectivity of Lateral Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation with Varying Electrode Diameters and Stimulation Configurations
Gilgal Justice Ansah, Matteo Del Brocco, … Lee E. Fisher·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- RECRUITMENT OF UPPER-LIMB MOTONEURONS WITH EPIDURAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE PRIMATE CERVICAL SPINAL CORD
N. Greiner, B. Barra, … M. Capogrosso·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2020
- Electrophysiological Characteristics of Epidural Spinal Signals in Preclinical Models of Spinal Cord Stimulation
Kimberley Ladner, Eline M. Versantvoort, … Ilona Obara·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2025
- Cervical Spinal Cord Modulation with Repeated Epidural Stimulation in Healthy Adult Rats
Pawan Sharma, Hema Rampersaud, Prithvi K. Shah·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2022
- Parameter-Dependent Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neural Activation and Evoked Compound Action Potentials
Meagan K. Brucker-Hahn, Hans J. Zander, … Scott F. Lempka·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026