Frontotemporal cortex flexibly adapts latent structural representations
Georgios TertikasiD, Nadescha TrudeliD, Miriam C. Klein-FlüggeiD, Tobias U. HauseriD
Abstract
Humans excel at navigating complex environments by forming abstract structural representations that can be flexibly updated when environments change. Here, we examine how the brain dynamically reconfigures these internal models in response to covert changes in latent hierarchies. Using a novel inference task and fMRI repetition suppression, we find that stable relational knowledge is encoded in medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), while structural changes trigger transient representations across hippocampal and prefrontal regions. Newly inferred associations are first encoded in anterior medial frontal cortex (amFC) and migrate ventrally to mOFC when settling. In contrast, outdated associations transiently engage frontopolar cortex and hippocampus, with the hippocampus, but not frontal areas, retaining a residual memory trace. Notably, the strength of early novel signals in amFC and hippocampus tracks individual differences in behavioural adaptation. Together, these results characterise mechanisms supporting adaptive structural reconfiguration in the human brain, with implications for cognitive inflexibility in psychiatric disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe brain relies on internal models of hidden environmental structure, yet how these models are revised when the world changes remains unclear. We developed a novel task and neuroimaging approach that allowed us to trace the emergence, maintenance, and dissolution of latent structural representations in humans. Stable representations were encoded in medial orbitofrontal cortex, whereas newly formed and outdated associations followed distinct temporal trajectories across frontal and hippocampal regions. Outdated representations transiently recruited frontopolar cortex but persisted in hippocampus after becoming behaviorally irrelevant. Neural signatures of updating predicted individual differences in adaptation, revealing candidate mechanisms through which cognitive flexibility, and its impairment in psychiatric disorders, may arise.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization
Avinash Rao Vaidya, Henry Morrow Jones, … David Badre·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2021
- Human orbitofrontal cortex signals decision outcomes to sensory cortex during behavioural adaptations
Bin Wang, Maike Veismann, … Burkhard Pleger·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- Hierarchical Reconfiguration of Neurocognitive Task Set Representations Mediates Cognitive Flexibility
Stephanie C. Leach, Xitong Chen, Kai Hwang·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2026
- Reversible fronto-occipitotemporal signaling complements task encoding and switching under ambiguous cues
Kaho Tsumura, Keita Kosugi, … Koji Jimura·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2021
- Hidden-state inference aligns attention and neural representational geometry during flexible behaviour
Casper Kerrén, Stephanie Theves, … Christian F. Doeller·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2025
- Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for inferred relationships in a structured world
Phillip P. Witkowski, Seongmin A. Park, Erie D. Boorman·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2022