The ten year evolution of Sherloc, a points-based framework for genetic variant classification
Yuya KobayashiiD, Marjorie Jody Westbrook, Christopher A. TaniD, Carla Márquez‐LunaiD, Alexander Wahl, Daniel B. SwartzlanderiD, Karen OuyangiD, Robert D. Daber
Abstract
ImportanceVariant classification underpins clinical genetics. We examine the impact of classification framework updates and the utility of semi-quantitative scores for interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VUS). ObjectiveEvaluate the impact of Sherloc on variant classification and VUS reduction in a large dataset. DesignCohort study using variant classification data generated between 2016 to 2025. Setting: A laboratory providing testing for hereditary genetic disorders. Participants5.5 million patients referred for genetic testing. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)We hypothesized that framework revisions would decrease the rate of VUS and improve accuracy. Outcome measures included changes in variant classification over time and in simulations. We further hypothesized that variant classification scores could predict the probability of pathogenicity and VUS reclassification rates. Outcome measures included the correlation of variant classification scores with the direction and rate of reclassification. ResultsSherloc has been used to classify 2.6 million variants across 19 successive versions (v4.2 to v7.1). Tracking 32,241 variants classified using v4.2, we found that 3,834 VUS had been reclassified by the end of the study period; 2801 (73%) of those relied on evidence criteria introduced after v4.2. In a simulation that removed various post-v4.2 evidence categories from 615,341 recent classifications, removing AI-related criteria alone changed 129,459 (21.04%) classifications. Classification reversals declined from 13/2909 (0.45%) in v4.2 to 7/61587 (0.011%) in v7.1, indicating improved accuracy concurrent with VUS reduction. The cumulative Sherloc score (pathogenic points minus benign points) strongly correlated with the log ratio of upgrades to downgrades (r{superscript 2} = 0.95), but less with the overall reclassification rate (r{superscript 2} = 0.49). Although VUS reclassified using RNA or cascade segregation analysis tended to have higher scores, the majority of reclassified variants had intermediate scores. Conclusion and RelevanceAdaptive, continuously updated classification systems that rapidly incorporate advances in clinical genetics, such as AI tools, reduce VUS and improve accuracy. Systematic performance monitoring, including reclassification tracking, enables data-driven improvements. A points-based framework like Sherloc represents progress toward probabilistic variant evaluation, which may lead to improved medical management.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- VUSVista: Enhancing the Curation of Variants of Uncertain Significance
Esther Spiteri, Jeanesse Scerri, Jean-Paul Ebejer·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025
- Distinct rates of VUS reclassification are observed when subclassifying VUS by evidence level
Gwendolyn Bennett, Izabela Karbassi, … Heidi L. Rehm·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- From Uncertain to Actionable: Significant Reduction in Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Germline Testing via Multi-Institutional Real-World Evidence
Kelly M. Schiabor Barrett, Matthew J. Ferber, … Elizabeth T. Cirulli·medRxiv·Aug 12, 2025
- The impact of systematized generation, evaluation, and incorporation of machine learning algorithms for clinical variant classification
Laure Frésard, Flavia M. Facio, … Keith Nykamp·medRxiv·Feb 3, 2025
- Evaluating the impact of in silico predictors on clinical variant classification
Emma H. Wilcox, Mahdi Sarmady, … Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2021
- Towards Analyzing the Reclassification Dynamics of ClinVar Variants
Andreas Ruscheinski, Anna Lena Reimler, … Adelinde M. Uhrmacher·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2023