Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List
S. M. E. Marsh, M. Hoffmann, N. D. Burgess, T. M. Brooks, D. W. S. Challender, P. J. Cremona, C. Hilton-Taylor, F. Lafaye de Micheaux, G. Lichtenstein, D. Roe, M. Bohm
Abstract
Unsustainable exploitation of wild species represents a serious threat to biodiversity and to the livelihoods of local communities and indigenous peoples. However, managed, sustainable use has the potential to forestall extinctions, aid recovery, and meet human needs. Research to date has focused on unsustainable biological resource use with little consideration of sustainable use; we infer the current prevalence of both. We analyzed species-level data for 30,923 species from 13 taxonomic groups on the IUCN Red List. Our results demonstrate the broad taxonomic prevalence of use, with 40% of species (10,098 of 25,009 species from 10 data-sufficient taxonomic groups) documented as being used. The main purposes of use are pets, display animals and horticulture, and human consumption. Use often has an adverse impact on species extinction risk (we define this as biologically unsustainable): intentional use is currently contributing to elevated extinction risk for over a quarter of all threatened or Near Threatened (NT) species (2,752 - 2,848 of 9,753 species). Intentional use also threatens 16% of all species used (1,597 - 1,631 of 10,098). However, 72% of species that are used (7,291 of 10,098) are Least Concern (LC), of which nearly half (3,469) also have stable or improving population trends. The remainder of used species are not documented as threatened by biological resource use, including 172 threatened or NT species with stable or improving populations. Around a third of species that have use documented as a threat do not currently receive targeted species management actions to directly address this threat. We offer suggestions for improving use-related Red List data. Our findings on the prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use, and variation across taxa, can inform international policymaking, including the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A global indicator of utilised wildlife populations: regional trends and the impact of management
L. McRae, R. Freeman, … N. D. Burgess·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2020
- Global Scientific and Public Interest in Birds and their Conservation
Haozhong Si, Stuart H. M. Butchart, … Enrico Di Minin·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2024
- What works to improve species conservation state? An analysis of species whose state has improved and the actions responsible
Ashley T. Simkins, William J. Sutherland, … Silviu O. Petrovan·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies
J. A. Tobias, A. L. Pigot·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2019
- Hard-to-sample species are more sensitive to land-use change: implications for global biodiversity metrics
Claudia Gutiérrez‐Arellano, Tim Newbold, Jenny A. Hodgson·Global Ecology and BiogeographyPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2025
- Redlisting the redlist: a global analysis of species distributions and biodiversity
A. C. Hughes·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2019