NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies
Virginia CondeiD, Leo TomaseviciD, Irina Akopian, Konrad Stanek, Guilherme B. SaturninoiD, Axel ThielscheriD, Til Ole BergmanniD, Hartwig Roman SiebneriD
- Citations
- 344
- FWCI
- 14.71
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Abstract
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) excites populations of neurons in the stimulated cortex, and the resulting activation may spread to connected brain regions. The distributed cortical response can be recorded with electroencephalography (EEG). Since TMS also stimulates peripheral sensory and motor axons and generates a loud \"click\" sound, the TMS-evoked EEG potential (TEP) not only reflects neural activity induced by transcranial neuronal excitation but also neural activity reflecting somatosensory and auditory processing. In 17 healthy young individuals, we systematically assessed the contribution of multisensory peripheral stimulation to TEPs using a TMS-compatible EEG system. Real TMS was delivered with a figure-of-eight coil over the left para-median posterior parietal cortex or superior frontal gyrus with the coil being oriented perpendicularly or in parallel to the target gyrus. We also recorded the EEG responses evoked by sham stimulation over the posterior parietal and superior frontal cortex, mimicking the auditory and somatosensory sensations evoked by real TMS. We applied state-of-the-art procedures to attenuate somatosensory and auditory confounds during real TMS, including the placement of a foam layer underneath the coil and auditory noise masking. Despite these precautions, the temporal and spatial features of the cortical potentials evoked by real TMS at the prefrontal and parietal site closely resembled the cortical potentials evoked by realistic sham TMS, both for early and late TEP components. Our findings stress the need to include a peripheral multisensory control stimulation in the study design to enable a dissociation between truly transcranial and non-transcranial components of TEPs.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The influence of somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials on concurrent transcranial-magnetic stimulation electroencephalography recordings
Nahian Shahmat Chowdhury, Nigel C. Rogasch, … Siobhan M. Schabrun·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2021
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2019
- Pinging the Brain with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Reactivity in Time and Space
Sangtae Ahn, Flavio Frӧhlich·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- The spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials reflects direct cortical activation
Matteo Fecchio, Simone Russo, … Mario Rosanova·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2025
- TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex: reliability, site specificity, and effects of NMDA receptor blockade
Nigel C. Rogasch, Carl Moritz Zipser, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2019