Frontiers in NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
μ-rhythm extracted with personalized EEG filters correlates with corticospinal excitability in real-time phase-triggered EEG-TMS
Natalie SchaworonkowiD, Pedro Caldana Gordon, Paolo BelardinelliiD, Ulf ZiemanniD, Til Ole BergmanniD, Christoph ZrenneriD
Abstract
Ongoing brain activity has been implicated in the modulation of cortical excitability. The combination of electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a real-time triggered setup is a novel method for testing hypotheses about the relationship between spontaneous neuronal oscillations, cortical excitability, and synaptic plasticity. For this method, a reliable real-time extraction of the neuronal signal of interest from scalp EEG with high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is of crucial importance. Here we compare individually tailored spatial filters as computed by spatial-spectral decomposition (SSD), which maximizes SNR in a frequency band of interest, against established local C3-centered Laplacian filters for the extraction of the sensorimotor -rhythm. Single-pulse TMS over the left primary motor cortex was synchronized with the surface positive or negative peak of the respective extracted signal, and motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded with electromyography (EMG) of a contralateral hand muscle. Both extraction methods led to a comparable degree of MEP amplitude modulation by phase of the sensorimotor -rhythm at the time of stimulation. This could be relevant for targeting other brain regions with no working benchmark such as the local C3-centered Laplacian filter, as sufficient SNR is an important prerequisite for reliable real-time single-trial detection of EEG features.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 57
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Not Just Noise: Aperiodic Brain Activity Reflects Corticospinal Excitability
Juliana Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities
Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch, … Christoph Zrenner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective
Anke Ninija Karabanov, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2021
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, … Alexander Opitz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states
Oskari Ahola, Lisa Haxel, … Ulf Ziemann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- Experimental Evaluation of Methods for Real-Time EEG Phase-Specific Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sina Shirinpour, Ivan Alekseichuk, … Alexander Opitz·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2020