henhaobio
Sign in

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Reward expectations direct learning and drive operant matching in Drosophila

Adithya E. RajagopalaniD, Ran DarshaniD, Karen L HibbardiD, James E. FitzgeraldiD, Glenn C TurneriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Foraging animals must use decision-making strategies that dynamically adapt to the changing availability of rewards in the environment. A wide diversity of animals do this by distributing their choices in proportion to the rewards received from each option, Herrnsteins operant matching law. Theoretical work suggests an elegant mechanistic explanation for this ubiquitous behavior, as operant matching follows automatically from simple synaptic plasticity rules acting within behaviorally relevant neural circuits. However, no past work has mapped operant matching onto plasticity mechanisms in the brain, leaving the biological relevance of the theory unclear. Here we discovered operant matching in Drosophila and showed that it requires synaptic plasticity that acts in the mushroom body and incorporates the expectation of reward. We began by developing a novel behavioral paradigm to measure choices from individual flies as they learn to associate odor cues with probabilistic rewards. We then built a model of the fly mushroom body to explain each flys sequential choice behavior using a family of biologically-realistic synaptic plasticity rules. As predicted by past theoretical work, we found that synaptic plasticity rules could explain fly matching behavior by incorporating stimulus expectations, reward expectations, or both. However, by optogenetically bypassing the representation of reward expectation, we abolished matching behavior and showed that the plasticity rule must specifically incorporate reward expectations. Altogether, these results reveal the first synaptic level mechanisms of operant matching and provide compelling evidence for the role of reward expectation signals in the fly brain.

Citations
29
FWCI
3.27
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGkanias '22Springer '21Vijayan '22Croteau-Cho '22Bennett '19Wiggin '21
76% semantic matchNeuroscience
Evripidis Gkanias, Li Yan McCurdy, Michael N. Nitabach+1 more·eLife·Mar 8, 2022· 24 citations