Identification of (ultra-)rare functional promoter mutations in cancer using sequence-based deep learning models
Tijs van LieshoutiD, Carlos G. Urzúa-TraslaviñaiD, Lucía Barbadilla-Martínez, Minh Chau Luong Boi, Harm-Jan WestraiD, Noud H.M. KlaasseniD, Vinícius H. Franceschini-SantosiD, Miguel Parra-MartineziD, Jeroen de RidderiD, Bas van SteenseliD, Emile E. VoestiD, Lude FrankeiD
Abstract
The identification of non-coding somatic cancer-driver mutations remains challenging due to difficulties in interpreting rare and ultra-rare variants. We hypothesized that sequence-based models can be used to systematically prioritize such mutations for their functional relevance. Here we present a computational framework that leverages sequence-based models to assess the functional impact of (ultra-)rare somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in promoter regions. We analysed SNVs derived from 24,529 whole-tumour genomes from three cohorts and applied the sequence-based model PARM, which was trained on massively parallel reporter assay data. We identified up to 492 promoter regions significantly enriched for putatively functional SNVs, including known cancer-drivers such as TERT. Overall, we find that functional promoter mutations are significantly enriched in established cancer-driver genes (p-value = 9.7{middle dot}10-5). Cross-cohort validation and replication using an independent sequence-based model (Borzoi) identified nine candidate cancer genes where the prioritized promoter mutations were shown to be functional by affecting gene expression levels. These genes included well known cancer genes such as including TERT, TP53 and PMS2, but also several new candidates for which no coding mutations have previously been implicated in cancer, including PMS2, AIMP2, SASS6, RPL13A, ALKBH4, FICD and YAE1. These findings demonstrate the utility of sequence-based models for identifying functional non-coding mutations and provide a framework for uncovering regulatory elements implicated in cancer.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying, Prioritizing, and Visualizing Functional Promoter SNVs with the Recurrence-agnostic REMIND-Cancer Pipeline and pSNV Hunter
Nicholas Allen Baclig Abad, Irina Glas, … Lars Feuerbach·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2024
- The promoter mutation paucity as part of the dark matter of the cancer genome
Nicholas Allen Baclig Abad, Irina Glas, … Lars Feuerbach·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2024
- Transformer models of mutation risk at base-pair resolution identify non-coding hotspot cancer driver mutations
Iván Galván‐Femenía, Marcell Veiner, … Fran Supek·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2026
- Recurrent promoter mutations in melanoma are defined by an extended context-specific mutational signature
Nils Johan Fredriksson, Kerryn Elliott, … Erik Larsson·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2017
- Discovery and characterization of coding and non-coding driver mutations in more than 2,500 whole cancer genomes
Esther Rheinbay, Morten Muhlig Nielsen, … Gad A. Getz·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2017
- DriverPower: Combined burden and functional impact tests for cancer driver discovery
Shimin Shuai, Steve Gallinger, … on behalf of the PCAWG Drivers and Functional Interpretation Group and the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Network·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2017