Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?
Sarah Bernardes GianvecchioiD, L. S. SakamotoiD, Luana Lelis SouzaiD, Lorena Ferreira BenficaiD, Juliana de Oliveira Santos MarcattoiD, Eduardo Marostegan de PaulaiD, Jéssica Moraes MalheirosiD, Roberta Carrilho CanesiniD, Sarah Figueiredo Martins BonilhaiD, Lúcia Galvão de AlbuquerqueiD, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti MercadanteiD
Abstract
Residual feed intake (RFI) detects animals that consume less dry matter (DM) adjusted for production and maintenance, and differences in the digestibility may explain differences in RFI among contemporaneous cattle. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between digestibility, RFI, and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotypes and also on RFI breeding value. One hundred twenty-two Nellore cattle submitted to performance testing in two test groups (249{+/-}4.33 days of age, and 332{+/-}4.22 days of age at the beginning of the test) were classified based on residual feed intake (RFI). A sample of 80 animals classified as low RFI (-0.748{+/-}0.076 kg DM/day) or high RFI (0.775{+/-}0.075 kg DM/day) was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and enteric methane (CH4, g/day) emission. There was no significant difference in feed compounds digestibility between the most and least efficient animals. However, DM intake (6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lower in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4 per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day; P=0.02); however, CH4 emission expressed as g/kg DM intake (23.1 vs. 20.1; P<0.01) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4 (8.13 vs. 7.08%; P<0.01) were higher in these animals. There are clear benefits (economic and environmental) of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. Variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in DM or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane (CH4, g/day) than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 22th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rumen Bacteria and Serum Metabolites Predictive of Feed Efficiency Phenotypes in Beef Cattle
B. A. Clemmons, C. Martino, … P. R. Myer·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2019
- Divergent effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on enteric methane emissions in Holstein and Brown Swiss cows, and its lack of synergy with Acacia mearnsii tannin extract
Z. Islam, Susanna Elisabeth Räisänen, … Mutian Niu·animalPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2025
- Ruminosignatures associated with methane emissions and feed efficiency across geographies and cattle breeds
Ioanna‐Theoni Vourlaki, Ori Furman, … Yuliaxis Ramayo‐Caldas·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Effect of different forage-to-concentrate ratios on the structure of rumen bacteria and its relationship with nutrition levels and real-time methane production in sheep
- Effects of 3-Nitrooxypropanol on Methane Emission, Growth and Feed Intake in Growing Calves from 5 Months of Age
Eline E. A. Burgers, A. Bannink, … Sanne van Gastelen·Journal of Animal SciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2025
- A meta-analysis of effects of seaweed and other bromoform containing feed ingredients on methane production, yield, and intensity in cattle
Ermias Kebreab, Eleanor May Pressman, … Jan Dijkstra·Journal of Dairy SciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2025