henhao
Sign in
GeneticsNucleic Acids Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Intrinsic DNA topology as a prioritization metric in genomic fine-mapping studies

Hannah C. AinsworthiD, Timothy D. HowardiD, Carl D. LangefeldiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

In genomic fine-mapping studies, some approaches leverage annotation data to prioritize likely functional polymorphisms. However, existing annotation sources often present challenges as many: lack data for novel variants, offer no context for noncoding regions, and/or are confounded with linkage disequilibrium. We propose a novel annotation source - sequence-dependent DNA topology - as a prioritization metric for fine-mapping. DNA topology and function are well-intertwined, and as an intrinsic DNA property, it is readily applicable to any genomic region. Here, we constructed and applied, Minor Groove Width (MGW), as a prioritization metric. Using an established MGW-prediction method, we generated an MGW census for 199,038,197 SNPs across the human genome. Summarizing a SNPs change in MGW ({Delta}MGW) as a Euclidean distance, {Delta}MGW exhibited a strongly right-skewed distribution, highlighting the infrequency of SNPs that generate dissimilar shape profiles. We hypothesized that phenotypically-associated SNPs can be prioritized by {Delta}MGW. We applied Bayesian and frequentist MGW-prioritization approaches to three non-coding regions associated with System Lupus Erythematosus in multiple ancestries. In two regions, including {Delta}MGW resolved the association to a single, trans-ancestral, SNP, corroborated by external functional data. Together, this study presents the first usage of sequence-dependent DNA topology as a prioritization metric in genomic association studies. Graphical AbstractWe hypothesize that SNPs imposing dissimilar minor groove width profiles ({Delta}MGW) are more likely to alter function. {Delta}MGW was interrogated genome-wide and then used as a weighting metric for fine-mapping associations. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=153 SRC="FIGDIR/small/837245v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (42K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d350adorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@155a2cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@132e30aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d7b065_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSrivastava '25Lu '15Li '24Wu '26Biddie '23Kichaev '16
55% semantic matchGenetics
Divyanshi Srivastava, Anna Korsakova, Qingbo Wang+3 more·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025· 4 citations