Ecological InformaticsEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
MetaBeeAI: an AI pipeline for structured evidence extraction from biological literature
Rachel H. ParkinsoniD, Henry CerboneiD, Mikael MieskolaineniD, Shuxiang CaoiD, Alex WilsoniD, Sergio AlbaceteiD, Emily B. ArmstrongiD, Chris BassiD, Cristina BotíasiD, Andrew BrowniD, Angela HaywardiD, Lina HerbertssoniD, Andrew K. JonesiD, Nicolas NaglooiD, Elizabeth NichollsiD, Elisa RigosiiD, Fabio SgolastraiD, Harry SiviteriD, Dara Anne StanleyiD, Lars StraubiD, Edward A. StrawiD, Rafaela TadeiiD, Kieran WalteriD, Heloise F. StevanceiD, Ryan K. DanielsiD, , Stephen J. RobertsiD
Abstract
The volume and complexity of scientific literature are expanding rapidly, making it increasingly difficult to extract and synthesise information across studies. This challenge is particularly acute in the biological sciences, where evidence spans multiple levels of organisation and heterogeneous experimental designs. Large Language Model (LLM) pipelines offer a scalable route to evidence synthesis, but many existing approaches lack transparency, modularity, and effective mechanisms for human oversight. We present MetaBeeAI, an open-source, modular pipeline that integrates established LLM techniques into a coherent, auditable workflow for structured data extraction in biology. MetaBeeAI combines modular prompting, multi-pass extraction, and expert-in-the-loop validation within an interface that presents model outputs alongside source text, enabling inspection, correction, and iterative refinement. The pipeline produces machine-readable records of prompts, configurations, and expert annotations, supporting reproducibility and continuous improvement. We apply MetaBeeAI to 924 research papers on bees and pesticides, extracting structured information on species, compounds, exposure designs, and experimental context. Evaluation demonstrates improved consistency, convergence with expert judgement, and robustness across heterogeneous biological studies, highlighting the value of expert-guided refinement. MetaBeeAI provides a transparent and extensible framework for scalable evidence synthesis, supporting reliable integration of LLMs into biological research workflows.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: deep learning
- approach: large language model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying Scientific Consensus in Biomedical Hypotheses via LLM-Assisted Literature Screening
Uiyun Kim, Ohhyeon Kwon, Doheon Lee·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026
- Dual-LLM Adversarial Framework for Information Extraction from Research Literature
Zhijing Li, Yunwen Yu, … Zexuan Zhu·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025
- OmniExtract: An automatic data extraction tool based on Large Language Model and Prompt Engineering
Yibo Wang, Bixia Tang, … Wenming Zhao·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Assessing the Performance of LLMs in Multimodal Information Extraction for Biological Research: A Case Study on LLPS
Ka Yin Chin, Satoru Fujii, … Kei Terayama·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2025
- Building a literature knowledge base towards transparent biomedical AI
Yuanhao Huang, Zhaowei Han, … Jie Liu·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2024
- Queryome: Orchestrating Retrieval, Reasoning, and Synthesis across Biomedical Literature
Pranav Punuru, Nabil Ibtehaz, … Daisuke Kihara·Journal of Biomedical SemanticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026