Exploring Genomic Conservation in Actinobacteriophages with Small Genomes
V. Y. Tse, H. Liu, A. Kapinos, C. Torres, M. Rahman, A. S. Vargas, B. C. S. Cayabyab, L. G. Nakashima, S. N. Fett, K. Reddi, J. Moberg Parker, A. C. Freise
Abstract
Actinobacteriophages of a wide range of genome sizes continue to be isolated and characterized, but only a handful of these have atypically small genomes, defined in this work as genome sizes under 20,000 bp. These "small phages" are relatively rare and have received minimal study thus far. Of the actinobacteriophages published in PhagesDB.org, small phages have been isolated on Arthrobacter, Gordonia, Rhodococcus, and Microbacterium hosts. A previous study by Pope et al. showed that Gordonia small phages have similar gene products and amino acid sequences. Here, we set out to further examine relationships between small Gordonia phages as well as small phages that infect other hosts. Of the 3222 sequenced phages listed on PhagesDB, we identified 109 distinctly small phages with genome sizes under 20,000 bp. The majority of the small phages were isolated on Arthrobacter or Microbacterium hosts. Using comparative genomics, we searched for patterns of similarity among 34 cluster-representative small phages. Dot plot comparisons showed that there was more amino acid conservation than nucleotide identity amongst small phages. Gene content similarity (GCS) analysis revealed that the temperate Gordonia phages in Cluster CW share significant GCS values (over 35%) with the lytic Arthrobacter phages in Cluster AN, suggesting that some small phages have a considerable degree of genomic similarity with each other. SplitsTree analyses of shared phams (genes with substantial amino acid identity) supported the complexity of clustering criteria in small phages, given shuffling of genes across phages of different clusters and close relationships despite varied cluster membership. We observed this continuum of phage diversity through Rhodococcus phage RRH1s closer similarity to phages in Gordonia subcluster CW1 than CW1 is to Gordonia subcluster CW3. Finally, we were able to confirm the presence of conserved phams across not only small Gordonia phages but also within small phages from different clusters and hosts. Studying these genomic trends hidden in small phages allows us to better understand and appreciate the overall diversity of phages.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characterization of Genomic Diversity In Bacteriophages Infecting Rhodococcus
D. R. Garza, D. Di Blasi, … A. C. Freise·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2022
- Comparative genomic analysis of Cluster AZ Arthrobacter phages
Amanda C. Freise, Kieran P. Furlong, … Adam D. Rudner·bioRxiv·May 26, 2025
- Novel Cluster AZ Arthrobacter phages Powerpuff, Lego, and YesChef exhibit close functional relationships with Microbacterium phages
A. Kapinos, P. Aghamalian, … J. Moberg Parker·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2020
- Characterization of novel Actinobacteriophage Giantsbane reveals unexpected cluster AU relationships
Pei Ying Chen, Christopher Liu, … Amanda C. Freise·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2020
- Evidence for shared ancestry between Actinobacteria and Firmicutes bacteriophages
Matthew T. Koert, Júlia López-Pérez, … Ivan Erill·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2021
- BlueFeather, the singleton that wasn't: Shared gene content analysis supports expansion of Arthrobacter phage cluster FE
S. Demo, A. Kapinos, … J. Moberg Parker·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2020