Beyond brain size: disentangling the effect of sex and brain size on brain morphometry and cognitive functioning
Aliza Brzezinski-RittneriD, Roqaie MoqadamiD, Yasser Iturria‐MedinaiD, M. Mallar ChakravartyiD, Mahsa DadariD, Yashar ZeighamiiD
Abstract
It is imperative to study sex differences in brain morphology and function. However, there are major observable and unobservable confounding factors that can contribute to the estimated differences. Males have larger head sizes than females. Head size differences not only act as a confounding factor in studying sex differences in the brain, but also impact its anatomy and functioning. In this work, we seek to disentangle the effect of head size from sex in studying sex differentiated aging trajectories, its relation to canonical functional networks and cytoarchitectural classes, brain allometry, cognition. Using the UK Biobank (UKBB) neuroimaging data (N = 35,732 participants, 19,281 females, 44-82 years of age), we created a subsample (N = 11,294) where females (N = 5,657) and males were matched by their total intracranial volume (TIV) and age, a subsample that maintains the UKBB sample distribution, one matched only by age, and one that exaggerated the TIV difference between sexes. We then modeled the aging trajectories at both regional and vertex-wise levels in the four subsamples, and compared the estimations of the models. Our results show that when females and males have the same head size, the overall sex estimations tend towards zero, suggesting that most of the variability results from head size differences. Our approach also revealed bidirectional sex differences in brain neuroanatomy previously masked by the effect of head size. Further, the scaling relationship between regional and total brain volume remains fairly consistent across the lifespan and is not sex differentiated overall. We evaluated how the results of cognitive tests with perceived sex differences are influenced and explained by head size and found that although the correlation between TIV and cognitive scores is low, the matching process changes the direction of the effect sizes of differences between sexes in "verbal and numerical reasoning" and "working memory" cognitive domains. Taken together, employing a matching approach that is widely used in causal modeling studies, we provide new evidence for disentanglement of sex differences in the brain from head size as a biological confound.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting Brain Volumes from Anthropometric and Demographic Features: Insights from UK Biobank Neuroimaging Data
Kimia Nazarzadeh, Simon Bodo Eickhoff, … Kaustubh R. Patil·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2026
- Neuroanatomical Norms in the UK Biobank: The Impact of Allometric Scaling, Sex, and Age.
Camille Michèle Williams, Hugo Peyre, … Franck Ramus·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2021
- Normative Sex Differences in Cognition and Morphometric Brain Connectivity: Evidence from 30,000+ UK Biobank Participants
Crystal C. Yang, Jana F. Totzek, … Katie M. Lavigne·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2023
- Sex Differences In The Adult Human Brain: Evidence From 5,216 UK Biobank Participants
Stuart James Ritchie, Simon R Cox, … Ian J. Deary·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2018
- Sex differences in intrinsic functional cortical organization reflect differences in network topology rather than cortical morphometry
Bianca Serio, Meike D. Hettwer, … Sofie Louise Valk·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2024
- Brain charts for neuroanatomical sex differences across the human lifespan
Margaret Gardner, Lena Dorfschmidt, … the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026