Scientific ReportsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Enhanced targeted resequencing by optimizing the combination of enrichment technology and DNA fragment length
Barbara IadarolaiD, Luciano XumerleiD, Denise LavezzariiD, Marta PaternoiD, Luca MarcolungoiD, Cristina Beltrami, Elisabetta FortunatiiD, Davide MeiiD, Annalisa VetroiD, Renzo GuerriniiD, Elena ParriniiD, Marzia RossatoiD, Massimo DelledonneiD
Abstract
Whole-exome sequencing (WES) enrichment platforms are usually evaluated by measuring the depth of coverage at target regions. However, variants called in WES are reported in the variant call format (VCF) file, which is filtered by minimum site coverage and mapping quality. Therefore, genotypability (base calling calculated by combining depth of coverage with the confidence of read alignment) should be considered as a more informative parameter to assess the performance of WES. We found that the mapping quality of reads aligned to difficult target regions was improved by increasing the DNA fragment length well above the average exon size. We tested three different DNA fragment lengths using four major commercial WES platforms and found that longer DNA fragments achieved a higher percentage of callable bases in the target regions and thus improved the genotypability of many genes, including several associated with clinical phenotypes. DNA fragment size also affected the uniformity of coverage, which in turn influences genotypability, indicating that different platforms are optimized for different DNA fragment lengths. Finally, we found that although the depth of coverage continued to increase in line with the sequencing depth (overall number of reads), base calling reached saturation at a depth of coverage that depended on the enrichment platform and DNA fragment length. This confirmed that genotypability provides better estimates for the optimal sequencing depth of each fragment size/enrichment platform combination.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Novel metrics to measure coverage in whole exome sequencing datasets reveal local and global non-uniformity
Qingyu Wang, Cooduvalli S. Shashikant, … Santhosh Girirajan·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2017
- Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage
Yury A. Barbitoff, Dmitrii E. Polev, … Alexander V. Predeus·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2020
- Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants
Aziz Belkadi, Alexandre Bolze, … Laurent Abel·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2015
- Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio
Vera Belova, Iuliia A. Vasiliadis, … Dmitriy O. Korostin·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- WEScover: selection of whole exome sequencing vs. gene panel testing
In‐Hee Lee, Yufei Lin, … Sek Won Kong·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2021
- A new massively parallel nanoball sequencing platform for whole exome research
Yu Xu, Zhe Lin, … Qiang Gao·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2019