henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Enhanced targeted resequencing by optimizing the combination of enrichment technology and DNA fragment length

Barbara IadarolaiD, Luciano XumerleiD, Denise LavezzariiD, Marta PaternoiD, Luca MarcolungoiD, Cristina Beltrami, Elisabetta FortunatiiD, Davide MeiiD, Annalisa VetroiD, Renzo GuerriniiD, Elena ParriniiD, Marzia RossatoiD, Massimo DelledonneiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) enrichment platforms are usually evaluated by measuring the depth of coverage at target regions. However, variants called in WES are reported in the variant call format (VCF) file, which is filtered by minimum site coverage and mapping quality. Therefore, genotypability (base calling calculated by combining depth of coverage with the confidence of read alignment) should be considered as a more informative parameter to assess the performance of WES. We found that the mapping quality of reads aligned to difficult target regions was improved by increasing the DNA fragment length well above the average exon size. We tested three different DNA fragment lengths using four major commercial WES platforms and found that longer DNA fragments achieved a higher percentage of callable bases in the target regions and thus improved the genotypability of many genes, including several associated with clinical phenotypes. DNA fragment size also affected the uniformity of coverage, which in turn influences genotypability, indicating that different platforms are optimized for different DNA fragment lengths. Finally, we found that although the depth of coverage continued to increase in line with the sequencing depth (overall number of reads), base calling reached saturation at a depth of coverage that depended on the enrichment platform and DNA fragment length. This confirmed that genotypability provides better estimates for the optimal sequencing depth of each fragment size/enrichment platform combination.

Citations
22
FWCI
1.61
Field percentile
top 18%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '17Barbitoff '20Belkadi '15Belova '25Lee '21Xu '19
62% semantic matchGenomics
Qingyu Wang, Cooduvalli S. Shashikant, Matthew Jensen+2 more·Scientific Reports·Apr 7, 2017· 70 citations