MIND the gap: methodological considerations and guidance for structural MRI similarity network analysis with MIND
Ashleigh DaviesiD, Edward HutchingsiD, Benjamin ChidiaciD, Madeline H. Garvey, Sarah Crockford, Isaac SebeniusiD, Richard A. I. BethlehemiD, Edward Thomas BullmoreiD, Sarah Elizabeth MorganiD
Abstract
Structural similarity networks quantify the similarity of structural properties across cortical regions, providing a macroscopic window onto the organisation of cortical architecture. Morphometric inverse divergence (MIND) is a multivariate metric of similarity between cortical areas, based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between areal distributions of multiple MRI features or morphometric variables locally measured at voxel or vertex resolution. MIND has demonstrated technical robustness and biological validity and is increasingly widely used as a measure of cortico-cortical similarity in clinical and developmental network neuroscience. Here we provide in-depth methodological background on KL divergence and MIND, highlighting possible sources of bias, critical user decision points in the design of a MIND processing pipeline, and recommendations for technical risk mitigation in using MIND as a metric of cortical similarity. We use simulated data and observational MRI datasets from adults (UK Biobank, N = 500 T1-weighted and diffusion scans) and neonates (Developing Human Connectome Project, N = 752 T2-weighted scans), to show how the estimator of KL divergence implemented in MIND is potentially influenced or biased by five properties of input MRI feature maps: (i) their smoothness; (ii) the proportion of identical values; (iii) analysis in native or common space and the choice of vertex mesh resolution; (iv) parcellation choice; and (v) covariance between input features. We offer principled and practical guidance for investigators wanting to specify and implement the MIND processing pipeline that is best suited to the constraints and opportunities of the MRI data available to them. These recommendations outline which pipeline steps should be used sparingly, such as vertex map smoothing; which should be used with informed caution, such as parcellation choice or vertex mesh resampling; and which could be newly implemented for more robust estimation of MIND, such as the use of principal component analysis to preprocess multivariate MRI features. To support further development of structural MRI similarity network analysis, and wider adoption of robust MIND methods, we also publish the code used to generate the results in this paper as an open resource.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MIND Networks: Robust Estimation of Structural Similarity from Brain MRI
Isaac Sebenius, Jakob Seidlitz, … Sarah Elizabeth Morgan·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2022
- Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organisation And Predict Inter-Individual Cognitive Variation
Jakob Seidlitz, František Váša, … Edward Thomas Bullmore·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2017
- Surface-based Single-subject Morphological Brain Networks: Effects of Morphological Index, Brain Parcellation and Similarity Measure, Sample Size-varying Stability and Test-retest Reliability
Yinzhi Li, Ningkai Wang, … Jinhui Wang·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2021
- Evaluating 35 Methods to Generate Structural Connectomes Using Pairwise Classification
Dmitry Petrov, Alexander Ivanov, … Paul M. Thompson·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- The genetic architecture of cortical similarity networks
Isaac Sebenius, Varun Warrier, … Sarah Elizabeth Morgan·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2026
- In-scanner head motion and structural covariance networks
Heath Pardoe, Samantha P. Martin·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2022