henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Pragmatic spatial sampling for wearable MEG arrays

Tim M. TierneyiD, Stephanie MelloriD, George C. O’NeilliD, Niall HolmesiD, Elena BotoiD, Gillian RobertsiD, Ryan M. HilliD, James LeggettiD, Richard W BowtelliD, Matthew J. BrookesiD, Gareth Robert BarnesiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Several new technologies have recently emerged promising new MEG systems in which the sensors can be placed close to the scalp. One such technology, Optically Pumped Magnetometry MEG (OP-MEG) allows for a scalp mounted flexible system that provides field measurements within mm of the scalp surface. A question that arises in developing on-scalp systems, such as OP-MEG scanners, is: how many sensors are necessary to achieve adequate performance/spatial discrimination? There are many factors to consider in answering this question such as the signal to noise ratio (SNR), the locations and depths of the sources of interest, the density of spatial sampling, sensor gain errors (due to interference, subject movement, cross-talk, etc.) and, of course, the desired spatial discrimination. In this paper, we provide simulations which show the impact these factors have on designing sensor arrays for wearable MEG. While OP-MEG has the potential to provide high information content at dense spatial samplings, we find that adequate spatial discrimination of sources (<1cm) can be achieved with relatively few sensors (<100) at coarse spatial samplings (~30mm) at high SNR. Comparable discrimination for traditional cryogenic systems require far more channels by these same metrics. Finally we show that sensor gain errors have the greatest impact on discrimination between deep sources at high SNR.

Citations
48
FWCI
2.54
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISIivanainen '16Zetter '18Alexander '26Jas '26Helbling '24Schofield '24
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Joonas Iivanainen, Matti Stenroos, Lauri T. Parkkonen·NeuroImage·Dec 19, 2016· 295 citations