bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Signal-to-noise ratio of event-related fields in on-scalp and off-scalp MEG
Mainak JasiD, Teppei MatsubaraiD, Abbas SohrabpouriD, Padmavathi SundaramiD, Maria ModyiD, Seppo P. AhlforsiD
Abstract
Abstract Optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) sensors can be placed closer to the scalp than conventional superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID), resulting in larger magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals from neuronal activity. For event-related sensor data, such as epileptogenic activity or sensory and motor evoked responses, however, OPMs and SQUIDs often differ less in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than in signal magnitude. We examined two factors contributing to the relative SNR: the dependence of the signal magnitude on source depth and the effect of scalp-to-sensor distance on the noise level. Simulated MEG data for a current dipole in a spherical head model confirmed that on-scalp sensor placement delivers the largest SNR gain for superficial sources. Depending on the relative overall noise level, there may be a crossover source depth at which SNR is equal for on-scalp and off-scalp sensors and beyond which off-scalp sensors achieve higher SNR. Analysis of the equal-SNR source depth in different-sized spherical head models indicated that, for a given relative noise level, the proportion of the brain where SNR is higher in OPM than in SQUID was larger in small head models, supporting the benefits of OPMs in pediatric studies. To experimentally evaluate noise contributions of brain and non-brain origin to the SNR, we recorded somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) at varying scalp-to-sensor distances. Generally, both the evoked response magnitude and the noise level were lower when the sensors were further away from the scalp; consequently, the SNR depended less than the signal magnitude on the scalp-to-sensor distance. Comparison of power spectral densities (PSDs) at different sensor-to-scalp distances allowed us to identify whether the dominant noise source was of brain or non-brain origin at different frequency bands. Overall, the results highlight complementary properties of OPMs vs. SQUIDs in terms of SNR, which is of interest when optimizing MEG experiments for specific subject populations and brain regions.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays
Joonas Iivanainen, Matti Stenroos, Lauri T. Parkkonen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2016
- Detection of the 40-Hz Auditory Steady-state Response with Optically Pumped Magnetometers
Kyung‐min An, Jeong Hyun Shim, … Kiwoong Kim·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2022
- On-scalp MEG system utilizing an actively shielded array of optically-pumped magnetometers
Joonas Iivanainen, Rasmus Zetter, … Lauri T. Parkkonen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019
- Requirements for coregistration accuracy in on-scalp MEG
Rasmus Zetter, Joonas Iivanainen, … Lauri T. Parkkonen·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2018
- Using OPM-MEG in contrasting magnetic environments
Ryan M. Hill, Jasen Devasagayam, … Matthew J. Brookes·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2022
- On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG
Lau M. Andersen, Christoph Pfeiffer, … Daniel Lundqvist·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2020