Malaria JournalEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
The impact of insecticide decay on the rate of insecticide resistance evolution for monotherapies and mixtures.
Abstract
The issue of insecticide decay in the public health deployments of insecticides is frequently highlighted as an issue for disease control. There are additional concerns insecticide decay also impacts the selection for insecticide resistance. Despite these concerns insecticide decay is lacking from models evaluating insecticide resistance management strategies. The impact of insecticide decay is modelled using a model which assumes a polygenic basis of insecticide resistance. Single generation selection events covering the insecticide efficacy and insecticide resistance space for both monotherapies and mixtures are conducted. With the outcome being the between generation change in the bioassay survival to the insecticides. The monotherapy sequence strategy and mixture strategy were compared against each other when including insecticide decay, with the outcome being the difference in strategy lifespan. The results demonstrate that as insecticides decay, they can apply a greater selection pressure than newly deployed insecticides, a process which can occur for both monotherapies and mixtures. For mixtures, it is seen that the rate of selection is highest when both insecticides are at reduced efficacies which would occur if reduced dose mixtures were used. Inclusion of insecticide decay in simulations was found to reduce the benefit of mixtures against monotherapy sequences, and this is especially so when reduced-dose mixtures are used. Insecticide decay is often highlighted as an important consideration for mixtures. The inclusion of insecticide decay in models is often lacking, and these results indicate this is absence may be over-inflating the performance of full-dose mixtures. As insecticides decay, they still provide selection pressures with reduced ability to control transmission, replenishing worn-out insecticides more frequently should be considered.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring operational requirements of mixtures for insecticide resistance management in public health using a mathematical model assuming polygenic resistance.
Neil Philip Hobbs, Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·May 6, 2024
- Insecticide resistance management strategies for public health control of mosquitoes exhibiting polygenic resistance: a comparison of sequences, rotations, and mixtures.
N. P. Hobbs, D. Weetman, I. Hastings·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2022
- Evaluating rotations as a strategy to delay the evolution of insecticide resistance in vectors of human diseases.
I. Hastings, S. Jones, A. South·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2022
- How best to co-deploy insecticides to minimise selection for resistance.
Sam P. Jones, Andy South, … Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2023
- Evaluating pesticide mixtures for resistance management in asexual insect pests
Luna Qingyang Li, Ricardo Kanitz, Philip G. Madgwick·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026
- Household level insecticide deployments (micro-mosaics) for insecticide resistance management: Evaluating deliberate and accidental deployments
Neil Philip Hobbs, Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2024