bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Household level insecticide deployments (micro-mosaics) for insecticide resistance management: Evaluating deliberate and accidental deployments
Abstract
Mixtures of two insecticides in a single formulation at full-dose are frequently evaluated as the "best" insecticide resistance (IRM) strategy in public health. However, this requires both insecticides to be mixed together in a single formulation which may not be possible or practical. Deploying different insecticides in different households ("micro-mosaics") may allow for mosquitoes to encounter different insecticides in subsequent gonotrophic cycles obtaining a "temporal mixture". We evaluate micro-mosaics considering their deliberate use and their accidental use using a mathematical model assuming polygenic resistance. Deliberate micro-mosaics are evaluated against rotations and mixtures (full-dose or half-dose) over a range of scenarios allowing for cross resistance and insecticide decay on their ability to slow the development of resistance. Accidental micro-mosaics are evaluated to understand the implication of mixture insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and standard (pyrethroid only) ITNs being deployed alongside one another on the development of resistance across a range of initial resistance scenarios. Deliberate micro-mosaics are found to not differ substantially in their IRM capability from either rotations or half-dose mixtures. When micro-mosaics do outperform rotations or half-dose mixtures the benefit is often small. Micro-mosaics are found to perform worse than full-dose mixtures. Accidental micro-mosaics are found to reduce the ability of mixtures to slow the development of resistance. The deployment of deliberate micro-mosaics was found to not be beneficial versus rotations or mixtures indicating this strategy should not be pursued. Micro-mosaics occurring accidentally due to multiple distribution channels inhibits the effectiveness of mixture ITNs in slowing the development of resistance. Where mixture ITNs are used keep the coverage of the mixture high relative to standard (pyrethroid-only) ITNs is key.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How best to co-deploy insecticides to minimise selection for resistance.
Sam P. Jones, Andy South, … Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2023
- Potential impacts of supplementing next generation long-lasting insecticidal nets with household-scale micro-mosaic deployment of indoor residual spraying with insecticides upon rates of incipient resistance trait emergence and selection
Dingani Chinula, Nicholaus Mziray, … Gerry F. Killeen·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2026
- Insecticide resistance management strategies for public health control of mosquitoes exhibiting polygenic resistance: a comparison of sequences, rotations, and mixtures.
N. P. Hobbs, D. Weetman, I. Hastings·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2022
- Combinations of Insecticide-Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying for Insecticide Resistance Management: A Modelling Exploration
Neil Philip Hobbs, Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2024
- Exploring operational requirements of mixtures for insecticide resistance management in public health using a mathematical model assuming polygenic resistance.
Neil Philip Hobbs, Ian Michael Hastings·bioRxiv·May 6, 2024
- The impact of insecticide decay on the rate of insecticide resistance evolution for monotherapies and mixtures.
Neil Philip Hobbs, Ian Michael Hastings·Malaria JournalPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2025