Disentangling Brain-Psychopathology Associations: A Systematic Evaluation of Transdiagnostic Latent Factor Models
Martin GelliD, Mauricio S Hoffmann, Tyler M. MooreiD, Aki NikolaidisiD, R. C. Gur, Giovanni A. SalumiD, Michael Peter MilhamiD, Robert LangneriD, Veronika I. MülleriD, Simon Bodo EickhoffiD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD, Brenden Tervo‐ClemmensiD
Abstract
Identifying robust brain-psychopathology associations with neuroimaging remains difficult, in part due to substantial heterogeneity within and comorbidity between diagnostic categories. Transdiagnostic latent factor models aim to address this structure by separating shared and unique symptom variance. However, it remains unclear whether latent factor modeling translates into stronger and more interpretable brain-psychopathology associations within contemporary whole-brain prediction frameworks. Using two large developmental cohorts, we systematically compared transdiagnostic bifactor models, correlated factor models, and typical summary scores derived from the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) in their reliability and multivariate associations with whole-brain structure (MRI) and function (resting-state fMRI). General psychopathology, internalising, externalising, and attention dimensions could be significantly predicted from resting-state connectivity but not cortical thickness. We found no consistent evidence that latent factors (bifactor or correlated factor models) strengthened reliability or brain-psychopathology associations, relative to summary scores. Neural signatures were also highly consistent across all scoring methods, with triple network (DMN, FPN, CO) involvement in general, internalizing, and externalising psychopathology. Bifactor scores did, however, display more distinct neural signatures between general, internalising, and externalising dimensions than did summary or correlated factor scores. Collectively, results suggest that additional phenotypic modelling of psychopathology alone does not systematically strengthen the predictive utility of neuroimaging, possibly reflecting fundamental limits on the amount of explainable symptom variance by brain features. While latent factor models may aid in distinguishing neural correlates between constructs, improving phenotypic assessment may be necessary for improvements to brain-psychopathology association strength.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Somatosensory-Motor Dysconnectivity Spans Multiple Transdiagnostic Dimensions of Psychopathology
Valeria Kebets, Avram J. Holmes, … B.T. Thomas Yeo·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2019
- Brain deviation scores derived from normative modelling identify dimensions of psychopathology in children and adolescents
Zheng Li, Bingqian Ren, … Libin Zhang·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2026
- Machine learning models identify multimodal measurements highly predictive of transdiagnostic symptom severity for mood, anhedonia, and anxiety
Monika S. Mellem, Yuelu Liu, … Parvez Ahammad·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2019
- Integrating Functional Transdiagnostic Dimensions of Psychopathology with Cortical Organization
Alicja Monaghan, Bratislav Mišić, … Richard A. I. Bethlehem·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2026
- Replicability of Structural Brain Alterations Associated with General Psychopathology: Evidence from a Population-Representative Birth Cohort
Adrienne L. Romer, Annchen R. Knodt, … Ahmad R. Hariri·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2019
- Criterion Validity and Relationships between Alternative Hierarchical Dimensional Models of General and Specific Psychopathology
Tyler M. Moore, Antonia N. Kaczkurkin, … Benjamin B. Lahey·Journal of Abnormal PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2020