bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Trace impurities in test stimuli can seriously compromise chemosensory studies
Dirk Louis P. SchorkopfiD, Béla Péter MolnáriD, Marit Solum, Mattias C. LarssoniD, Jocelyn G. MillariD, Zsolt KárpátiiD, Teun DekkeriD
Abstract
The discovery of olfactory receptors and major technological advances have greatly accelerated our understanding of chemosensory mechanisms. However, some of this rapid progress may be compromised by inadequate knowledge or characterization of the purity of chemical stimuli used to challenge olfactory or other chemoreceptors when mapping their response profiles. Here, we provide strong evidence that the presence of trace impurities in test stimuli can completely obscure true ligand-receptor relationships. DmOR7a, an olfactory receptor of the vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has been reported to respond to several long-chain aliphatic ligands such as a putative Drosophila pheromone1, the pheromone of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori2, and a common fatty acid, linoleic acid3. By contrast, we show that DmOR7a responds with high sensitivity to volatile impurities and degradation products present in minute quantities in authentic standards of those compounds, but not to the standards themselves. Responses to impurities can easily go unnoticed due to two main factors. First, the sensitivity of receptors to key ligands may be greater than that of analytical chemistry instruments used to check sample purity. Second, the concentration of highly volatile impurities in an odour puff may be orders of magnitude higher than the main component of a sample, due to the large differences in vapour pressures between the impurities and the main component. Issues concerning impurities are not limited to studies on olfaction that use odour puffs to characterize receptor-ligand interactions, but may affect all studies on chemosensation, from molecular biology and in-silico predictions to behaviour. Purity, which is crucial in receptor-ligand studies, is always implied, but rarely checked rigorously. To avoid misinterpretations, a proper account of all compounds present in test stimuli and an unequivocal confirmation of ligand affinity should accompany chemosensory studies.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Single olfactory receptors set odor detection thresholds
Adam Dewan, Annika Cichy, … Thomas C. Bozza·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2018
- Olfactory receptors are sensitive to molecular volume of odorants
Majid Saberi, Hamed Seyed-allaei·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2016
- Modulation of taste sensitivity by the olfactory system in Drosophila
Pierre Junca, Molly Stanley, … Michael D. Gordon·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2021
- Gated Coupling of Dopamine and Neuropeptide Signaling Underlies Perceptual Processing of Appetitive Odors in Drosophila
Yuhan Pu, Melissa Megan Masserant Palombo, … Ping Shen·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2017
- Chemoreceptor Co-Expression in Drosophila Olfactory Neurons
Darya Task, Chun-Chieh Lin, … Christopher J. Potter·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2022
- Mixtures are more salient stimuli in olfaction
Ho Ka Chan, Thomas Nowotny·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2017