Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods and Data Analysis Strategies for Complete Metaproteomic Soil Analysis
Abigale S. Mikolitis, Phillip M. MachiD, Marie KroegeriD, Ethan M. McBrideiD, Trevor GlarosiD
Abstract
Considerable microbial diversity has been discovered in soil through genomic sequencing. Despite its role in biogeochemical cycling, relatively little is known about the proteomic diversity of the soil microbiome as most commercially available soil kits focus on DNA/RNA extractions. Consequently, a plethora of protein extraction techniques have been developed for soil but have yet to be integrated into simplified, modern sample preparation techniques such as the S-Trap. Furthermore, classical data analysis strategies for soil metaproteomics rely on genomically-informed databases for peptide/protein identification. This assumes that DNA/RNA extracts adequately represent the soil proteome. Within this study, we systematically assess several extraction techniques, developing a data processing pipeline which is driven by both proteomics and genomics to fully characterize the soil microbiome. Both pipelines reveal remarkably complementary data, with [~]60% of the protein identifications coming from Proteomically-derived databases. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-based extractions proved to provide the most unique protein identifications ([~]3000 proteins), and by combining both proteomic and genomic-based results, the total protein identifications increased approximately 2-fold for each extraction. Combining these complementary data pipelines with improved extraction techniques can allow for drastically improved proteomic results (12,307 unique protein identifications), even from minute (50 mg) sample volumes. These enhancements to previous workflows can better describe the microbial diversity within soil and provide a deeper functional understanding of the soil microbiome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of the Park Grass Experiment soil metaproteome
G. A. Quinnn, A. M. Abdelhameed, … G. van Keulen·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2021
- Uncovering hidden members and functions of the soil microbiome using de novo metaproteomics
Joon‐Yong Lee, Hugh D. Mitchell, … Samuel Payne·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2022
- Scalable isolation of soil genomic DNA from microbes to multicellular micro- and mesofauna
Sannakajsa Velmala, Tero T. Tuomivirta, … Taina Pennanen·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2026
- Soil metatranscriptomics: An improved RNA extraction method toward functional analysis using nanopore direct RNA sequencing
A. Poursalavati, V. Jalali Javaran, … M. Lamine Fall·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2022
- A comparison of hard and soft direct methods for DNA extraction from soil
P. B. Hill, M. F. Dextraze, … C. N. Boddy·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022
- Effects of source sample amount on biodiversity surveys of bacteria, fungi, and nematodes in soil ecosystems
T. Kageyama, H. Toju·bioRxiv·May 26, 2022