bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
A rapid urban biodiversity blitz using aquatic environmental DNA
K. Hupalo, M. Majaneva, M. V. Czachur, L. Sire, D. Marquina, D. A. Lijtmaer, V. Ivanov, S. Leidenberger, F. Ciampor, Z. Ciamporova-Zatovicova, I. S. Mendes, A. Desiderato, L. Topstad, K. Meganck, D. Hariz Z. A., G. Kjaerstad, X.-L. Lin, B. Price, M. Stevens, T. Ekrem, K. Deiner
Abstract
Background As global biodiversity declines, there’s an increasing need to create an educated and engaged society. Having people from all ages participate in measuring biodiversity where they live helps to create awareness. Recently, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for biodiversity surveys has gained momentum. Here, we test whether sampling eDNA and metabarcoding can be used for rapid urban biodiversity surveys for educational purposes.Materials & Methods We sampled 2×1 L of water from each of 15 locations in the city of Trondheim, Norway, including a variety of freshwater, marine and brackish habitats. DNA was extracted, amplified in triplicate for the COI gene and sequenced. The obtained data were analysed on the novel mBRAVE platform, an online open access software and computing resource.Results The water samples were collected in two days by two people and the lab analysis was completed in five days by one person. Overall, we detected the presence of 501 taxa identified as belonging to 435 species, representing 90 orders and 18 phyla. On average, only 5.4% of the taxa were shared among six replicates per site. Based on the observed diversity, three distinct clusters were detected and related to geographic distribution of sites. There were some taxa shared between the habitats, with a substantial presence of terrestrial biota.Discussion Our results match expected patterns of biodiversity in the landscape and show that with minimal sampling effort, hundreds of species can be detected. Thus, using eDNA analysis of water is promising for rapid biodiversity surveys, and it is likely that more detailed results could be obtained by optimising field and lab methods for particular groups of interest. We recommend that rapid eDNA surveys, with openly available services and softwares, can be used to raise awareness in the importance of biodiversity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water
Luke E. Holman, Mark de Bruyn, … Marc Rius·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2019
- On-site metabarcoding analysis of environmental DNA samples
Quentin Mauvisseau, Isabelle Ewers, … Jonathan Stuart Ready·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity
O. Tournayre, H. Tian, … S. C. Lougheed·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- Environmental DNA from a small sample of reservoir water can tell volumes about its biodiversity.
André LQ Torres, Danielle Luciana Aurora Soares do Amaral, … Mauro de Freitas Rebelo·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2021
- DNA Divers: volunteer-based eDNA capture for local and global marine biodiversity monitoring
Erika F. Neave, Annie Watson, … Stefano Mariani·bioRxiv·May 26, 2025