bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Impact of the pulse artifact on evoked activity in human wakefulness and sleep
Jacinthe Cataldi, Andria PelentritouiD, Sophie SchwartziD, Marzia De Lucia EiD
Abstract
The investigation of the neural evoked response to the heartbeat quantified using electroencephalography (i.e., heartbeat evoked potentials or HEPs), has gained recent attention in neuroscience, notably as a measure of interoception, the sensory system responding to internal bodily states. One main challenge in measuring HEPs is their susceptibility to cardiac artifacts contamination, including the cardiac field artifact and the pulse artifact (PA), the latter possibly caused by the mechanical pressure of pulsating vessels. Here, we aimed at assessing the impact of PAs on HEPs and auditory evoked potentials (AEPs, a proxy of the neural responses to exteroceptive sensory stimuli). To this aim, we compared two pre-processing pipelines using independent component analysis in healthy volunteers (N=30). The first, standard, pipeline excluded ocular, muscle, sweating-related activity and cardiac-related activity stemming from the cardiac field artifact. The second, pairwise phase consistency (PPC) pipeline, in addition to the removal of the aforementioned components, used the quantitative metric of PPC between independent components and the ECG to remove the cardiac-related PA. We tested how these two pre-processing approaches influenced HEPs and AEPs recorded under diverse neurophysiological conditions (wakefulness, N2, N3, and REM sleep). Comparing the HEPs from the standard and the PPC approaches (cluster-based permutation statistics, p0.05, two-tailed) on the HEPs in N3 sleep and on the AEPs in all vigilance states. Our results emphasize the need to account for the PA as a significant confounding factor when comparing HEPs across groups with varying vascular or cardiac conditions.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Silent brains isolate the heartbeat-evoked potential
Rohan Kandasamy, Rania-Iman Virjee, … Mahinda Yogarajah·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Methodological approaches to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: pastpractices and future recommendations
Rania-Iman Virjee, Rohan Kandasamy, … Mahinda Yogarajah·Social Cognitive and Affective NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Can the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) be separated from Cardiac Artefact (CA) using beamforming?
Rania-Iman Virjee, Rohan Kandasamy, … David William Carmichael·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026
- Validating genuine changes in Heartbeat Evoked Potentials using Pseudotrials and Surrogate Procedures
Tim Paul Steinfath, Nadine Herzog, … Arno Villringer·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Heartbeat and Somatosensory Perception
Esra Al, Fivos Iliopoulos, … Arno Villringer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2021
- Heart-Brain Interactions Shape Somatosensory Perception and Evoked Potentials
Esra Al, Fivos Iliopoulos, … Arno Villringer·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2020