Social Cognitive and Affective NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Methodological approaches to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: pastpractices and future recommendations
Rania-Iman VirjeeiD, Rohan KandasamyiD, Sarah N. GarfinkeliD, David William CarmichaeliD, Mahinda YogarajahiD
Abstract
The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is an implicit, electrophysiological marker of cortical heartbeat processing and interoception, with increasing clinical relevance. However, on the scalp, HEP are low-amplitude signals mixed with cardiac field artefacts (CFA), requiring signal processing pipelines to separate HEP from CFA. This review evaluates current analytical approaches, addresses methodological gaps in HEP pipelines, and examines the impact of key parameter choices. HEP processing methods/parameters used in EEG (N=101) and MEG (N=10) studies were investigated, focusing on the effects of HEP window, electrodes, filters, independent component analysis (ICA) and artefact subspace reconstruction (ASR), on HEP extraction, using Temple Universitys normal scalp EEG data. EEG and MEG studies revealed clear inconsistencies in HEP parameter use and reporting. ASR-20 (ASR threshold for artifact identification) performed comparably to ICA for artefact removal, supporting its potential real-time EEG applicability. Epoch rejection, a HEP quality metric, appeared equivalent between ICA and ASR-20 after artefact removal. Linear Mixed Model analysis identified significant effects of RR interval, maximum epoch amplitude, HEP window and baseline correction start time on measured HEP amplitude. Publications should report critical values for reliable HEP extraction, emphasising the need for standardised methods to enhance study comparability and reproducibility.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Silent brains isolate the heartbeat-evoked potential
Rohan Kandasamy, Rania-Iman Virjee, … Mahinda Yogarajah·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Can the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) be separated from Cardiac Artefact (CA) using beamforming?
Rania-Iman Virjee, Rohan Kandasamy, … David William Carmichael·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026
- Impact of the pulse artifact on evoked activity in human wakefulness and sleep
Jacinthe Cataldi, Andria Pelentritou, … Marzia De Lucia E·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025
- Validating genuine changes in Heartbeat Evoked Potentials using Pseudotrials and Surrogate Procedures
Tim Paul Steinfath, Nadine Herzog, … Arno Villringer·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Heartbeat-evoked responses in M/EEG: A systematic review of methods with suggestions for analysis and reporting
Tim Paul Steinfath, Maria Azanova, … Arno Villringer·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- Heartbeat and Somatosensory Perception
Esra Al, Fivos Iliopoulos, … Arno Villringer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2021