Conserved signaling pathways antagonize and synergize with co-opted doublesex to control development of novel mimetic butterfly wing patterns
N. VanKuren, M. M. Doellman, S. I. Sheikh, D. H. P. Droguett, D. Massardo, M. Kronforst
Abstract
Novel phenotypes are increasingly recognized to have evolved by co-option of conserved genes into new developmental contexts, yet the impact of co-option on existing developmental programs remains obscure. Here we provide insight into this process by characterizing the consequences of doublesex co-option on wing color pattern development in Papilio swallowtail butterflies. doublesex is the master regulator of insect sex differentiation but has been co-opted to control the switch between discrete mimetic and non-mimetic, male-like color patterns in Papilio polytes and its close relatives. Here we show that development of the mimetic color pattern in P. polytes is caused by a pulse of dsx expression early in female wing development that results in a corresponding pulse of differential expression that both alters color pattern development and quickly becomes decoupled from dsx expression itself. Differentially expressed genes were enriched in canonical Wnt and Hedgehog signaling pathway genes, but case studies of key genes using RNAi and antibody stains suggested opposing, novel roles for the two pathways in mimetic color pattern development. The pulse of Dsx expression caused Engrailed, the key transcription factor effector of Hh signaling, to gain anterior expression in early pupal wing development. However, Dsx and En became decoupled by mid-pupal development when En pre-figured melanic and red patterns and Dsx pre-figured white patterns. In contrast, Wnt signaling antagonizes Dsx in restricted regions of the wing to refine the mimetic color pattern. Our results therefore provide strong experimental evidence that dsx co-option significantly altered spatiotemporal activities of conserved wing patterning pathways to promote and refine the development of a novel adaptive color pattern. Altogether, our findings provide strong evidence for how co-opted genes can both cause and elicit changes to established gene regulatory networks during the evolution and development of novel phenotypes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A shared gene but distinct dynamics regulate mimicry polymorphisms in closely related species
Sofia I. Sheikh, Meredith M. Doellman, … Marcus R. Kronforst·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2025
- apterous A Specifies Dorsal Wing Patterns And Sexual Traits In Butterflies
Anupama Prakash, Antónia Monteiro·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2018
- Transcriptome analysis reveals evolutionary co-option of neural development and signaling genes for the wing pigmentation pattern of the polka-dotted fruit fly.
Yuichi Fukutomi, Shu Kondo, … Shigeyuki Koshikawa·FEBS JournalPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020
- nubbin, ventral veinless, and pdm3 play diverse roles in butterfly wing pattern development
Jeanne M.C. McDonald, Qin Guo, … Robert D. Reed·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- Functional unit and regulatory mechanisms of supergene in female-limited Batesian mimicry of Papilio polytes
Shinya Komata, Shinichi Yoda, … Haruhiko Fujiwara·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Sexually dimorphic traits and male-specific differentiation are actively regulated by Doublesex during specific developmental windows in Nasonia vitripennis
Yidong Wang, Anna H. Rensink, … Eveline C. Verhulst·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2020