medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Recalibrating Mendelian randomization under winner's curse, sample structure and polygenicity
Abstract
Recently, Hu et al. (2024) conducted a benchmarking study showing that most existing Mendelian randomization (MR) methods exhibit substantial bias and inflated type-I error rates in real data. They attributed these failures to two largely neglected sources of bias: winners curse and polygenicity-induced bias. Although a few methods have been developed to address one or both of these issues, existing approaches either do not fully account for both biases or are restricted to the univariable setting. In this paper, we propose a multivariable Rao-Blackwellization that corrects winners curse while accounting for polygenicity and sample structure in a unified framework. Unlike univariable Rao-Blackwellization, where instrument selection yields a truncated normal statistic amenable to a Mills-ratio correction, multivariable Rao-Blackwellization conditions on a noncentral{chi} 2 statistic, for which no analogous correction is available. We derive closed-form conditional moments under this instrument selection model and use them to construct bias-corrected summary statistics that can be integrated into a wide range of existing MR methods. Simulations and real data analyses show that, when combined with methods such as MR-cML and MR-BEE, the proposed correction substantially improves type-I error control and yields more robust inference.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: polygenic risk
- approach: statistical model
- approach: Bayesian inference
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MRBEE: A novel bias-corrected multivariable Mendelian Randomization method
Noah J Lorincz‐Comi, Yihe Yang, … Xiaofeng Zhu·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2023
- Incorporating discovery and replication GWAS into summary data Mendelian randomization studies: A review of current methods and a simple, general and powerful alternative
Ninon Mounier, David S. Robertson, … Jack Bowden·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2023
- Benchmarking Mendelian Randomization methods for causal inference using genome-wide association study summary statistics
Xianghong Hu, Mingxuan Cai, … Can Yang·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2024
- A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy
Andrew J. Grant, Stephen Burgess·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Simulated sample splitting approach to address biases due to instrument selection and participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian Randomization studies
Amanda Forde, Gibran Hemani, John P. Ferguson·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2026
- Mendelian Randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics
Xianghong Hu, Jia Zhao, … Can Yang·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2022