bioRxivBiophysics
Dissecting the co-segregation probability from genome architecture mapping
Abstract
The genome architecture mapping (GAM) is a recently developed methodology that offers the co-segregation probability of two genomic segments from an ensemble of thinly sliced nuclear profiles, enabling to probe and decipher the 3D chromatin organization. The co-segregation probability from GAM, which typically probes the length scale associated with the genomic separation greater than 1 MB, is, however, not identical to the contact probability obtained in Hi-C, and its correlation with inter-locus distance measured with FISH is not so good as the contact probability. In this study, by using a polymer-based model of chromatins, we derive a theoretical expression of the co-segregation probability as well as that of the contact probability, and carry out quantitative analyses of how they differ from each other. The results from our study, validated with in-silico GAM analysis on 3D genome structures from FISH, suggest that to attain strong correlation with the inter-locus distance, a properly normalized version of co-segregation probability needs to be calculated based on a large number of nuclear slices (n > 103). SIGNIFICANCEBy leveraging a polymer model of chromatin, we critically assess the utility of co-segregation probability captured from GAM analysis. Our polymer model, which offers analytical expressions for the co-segregation probability as well as for the contact probability and inter-locus distance, enables quantitative comparison between the data from GAM, Hi-C, and FISH. Although the plain co-segregation probabilities from GAM are not well correlated with inter-locus distances measured from FISH, properly normalized versions of the probability calculated from a large number of nuclear profiles can still reasonably represent the inter-locus distance. Our study offers instructions of how to take full advantage of GAM analysis in deciphering 3D genome organization.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of the Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE methods by use of polymer models of chromatin
L. Fiorillo, F. Musella, … M. Nicodemi·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2020
- FISH-ing for captured contacts: towards reconciling FISH and 3C
Geoffrey Fudenberg, Maxim Imakaev·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2017
- Computing 3D chromatin configurations from contact probability maps by Inverse Brownian Dynamics
K. Kumari, B. Duenweg, … R. P. Jagadeeshan·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2019
- Multiplex-GAM: genome-wide identification of chromatin contacts yields insights not captured by Hi-C
Robert A. Beagrie, Christoph J. Thieme, … Ana Pombo·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2023
- GAMtools: an automated pipeline for analysis of Genome Architecture Mapping data
Robert A. Beagrie, Markus Schueler·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2017
- A universal polymer signature in Hi-C resolves cohesin loop density and supports monomeric extrusion
Kirill Polovnikov, Dmitry Starkov·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026