bioRxivPhysiology
Differences in the Pupillary Responses to Evening Light between Children and Adolescents
L. E. Hartstein, M. K. LeBourgeois, M. T. Durniak, R. P. Najjar
Abstract
PurposeTo assess differences in the pupillary light responses (PLRs) to blue and red evening lights between children and adolescents. MethodsForty healthy participants (8-9 years, n=21; 15-16 years, n=19) completed a PLR assessment 1 h before their habitual bedtime. After a 1 h dim-light adaptation period (<1 lux), baseline pupil diameter was measured in darkness for 30 s, followed by a 10 s exposure to 3.0x1013 photons/cm2/s of either red (627 nm) or blue (459 nm) light, and a 40 s recovery in darkness to assess pupillary re-dilation. Subsequently, participants underwent 7 min of dim-light re-adaptation followed by an exposure to the other light condition. Lights were counterbalanced across participants. ResultsAcross both age groups, maximum pupil constriction was significantly greater (p< 0.001, {eta}p2=0.48) and more sustained (p< 0.001, {eta}p2=0.41) during exposure to blue compared to red light. For adolescents, the post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR), a hallmark of melanopsin function, was larger after blue compared with red light (p= 0.02, d=0.60). This difference was not observed in children. Across light exposures, children had larger phasic (p< 0.01, {eta}p2=0.20) and maximal (p< 0.01, {eta}p2=0.22) pupil constrictions compared to adolescents. ConclusionsBlue light elicited a greater and more sustained pupillary response than red light across participants. However, the overall amplitude of the rod/cone-driven phasic response was greater in children than in adolescents. Our findings using the PLR highlight a higher sensitivity to evening light in children compared to adolescents, and continued maturation of the human non-visual photoreception/system throughout development.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pulses of melanopsin-directed contrast produce highly reliable pupil responses that are insensitive to a change in background radiance
Harrison M. McAdams, Aleksandra Igdalova, … Geoffrey K. Aguirre·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2018
- Spectral dependency of the human pupillary light reflex. Influences of pre-adaptation and chronotype.
J. Zauner, H. Plischke, H. Strasburger·bioRxiv·May 28, 2021
- ILLUSORY LIGHT DRIVES PUPIL RESPONSES IN PRIMATES
J.-B. Durand, S. Marchand, … V. De Castro·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2024
- Cortical Excitability is Affected by Light Exposure - Distinct Effects in Adolescents and Young Adults
Roya Sharifpour, Fermin Balda, … Gilles Vandewalle·Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian RhythmsPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2025
- Phasic pupil responses to melanopsin- and cone-directed stimulation remain stable across circadian time
Hannah Sophie Heinrichs, Diana Glebowicz, Manuel Spitschan·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- Impact of repeated short light exposures on sustained pupil responses in an fMRI environment
Elise Beckers, Islay Campbell, … Gilles Vandewalle·Journal of Sleep ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2023