bioRxivPathology
Passive epidemiological surveillance in wildlife in Costa Rica identifies pathogens of zoonotic and conservation importance
A. Alfaro-Alarcon, F. Aguilar, T. Solorzono, M. Baldi, E. Barquero-Calvo, A. Jimenez-Rocha, C. Jimenez, M. Piche-Ovares, G. Dolz, B. Leon, E. Corrales-Aguilar, M. Santoro
Abstract
Epidemiological surveillance systems for pathogens in wild species have been proposed as a preventive measure for epidemic events. These systems can minimize the detrimental effects of an outbreak, but most importantly, passive surveillance systems are the best adapted to countries with limited resources. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the technical and infrastructural feasibility to establish this type of scheme in Costa Rica targeting thedetection of pathogens of zoonotic and conservation importance in wildlife. Between 2018 and 2020, 85 carcasses of free-ranging vertebrates were admitted for post mortem analysis and complementary laboratory analysis, representing a solid basis for the implementation of a passive surveillance system for wildlife diseases in the country. However, we encounter during this research significant constraints that affected the availability of carcasses for analysis, mainly related to the initial identification of cases, detection biases towards events in populated- or easily accessible-areas with nearby located wildlife management centers, further associated with financial disincentives, and limited local logistics capacity. Thus resulting in the exclusion of some geographic regions of the country. This epidemiological surveillance scheme allowed us to estimate the general state of health of the countrys wildlife, establishing the cause of death of the analyzed animals as follows: (i) 46 (54.1%) traumatic events, (ii) 23 (27.1%) infectious agents, (iii) two (2.4%) degenerative illness, (iv) three (3.5%) presumably poisoning, and (v) in 11 (12.9%)undetermined. It also allowed the detection of pathogens such as, canine distemper virus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma spp., Angiostrongylus spp., Dirofilaria spp., Baylisascaris spp., among others. As well as recognizing the circulation of these pathogens around national territory and also on those analyzed species. This strategy is crucial in geographical regions defined as critical for the appearance of diseases due to their great biodiversity and social conditions.
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Lessons from a multilaboratorial task force for diagnosis of a fatal toxoplasmosis outbreak in captive primates in Brazil
F. B. Schiffler, S. B. Moreira, … A. F. Santos·MicroorganismsPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2023
- Uncovering parasite diversity in Ecuadorian wildlife: new trypanosomatid species and novel reservoir hosts for Leishmania amazonensis
Manuel Alejandro Coba-Males, Alexei Yu. Kostygov, … Ana Poveda·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2026
- SARS-CoV-2 wildlife surveillance in Ontario and Quebec, Canada
J. E. Greenhorn, J. D. Kotwa, … S. Mubareka·Canada Communicable Disease ReportPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2022
- Prevalence of the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in amphibians of Costa Rica predated first-known epizootic
V. T. Vredenburg, M. E. De Leon, … F. Bolanos·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2018
- Selecting sites for strategic surveillance of zoonotic pathogens: a case study in Panama
Marlon E. Cobos, Jonathan L. Dunnum, … Jocelyn P. Colella·EcoHealthPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2025
- Using serosurveys to optimize surveillance for zoonotic pathogens
Erin Clancey, Scott L. Nuismer, Stephanie N. Seifert·EcoHealthPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2026