Sign in
Systems BiologyPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

Detection and measurement of butterfly eyespot and spot patterns using convolutional neural networks

Carolina Cunha, Hemaxi NarotamoiD, Antónia MonteiroiD, Margarida SilveiraiD

Abstract

Butterflies are increasingly becoming model insects where basic questions surrounding the diversity of their color patterns are being investigated. Some of these color patterns consist of simple spots and eyespots. To accelerate the pace of research surrounding these discrete and circular pattern elements we developed two distinct convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for detection and measurement of butterfly spots and eyespots on digital images of butterfly wings. We tested the accuracy of the detection and of the area measurements using manual identifications and measurements. These methods were able to identify and distinguish marginal eyespots from spots, as well as distinguish these patterns from less symmetrical patches of color. In addition, the measurements of an eyespots central area and surrounding rings were highly accurate. These CNNs offer improvements of eyespot/spot detection and measurements relative to previous methods because it is not necessary to mathematically define the feature of interest. All that is needed is to point out the images that have those features to train the CNN. Author summaryWe developed two distinct convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for detection and measurement of butterfly spots and eyespots on digital images of butterfly wings. We tested the accuracy of the detection and of the area measurements using manual identifications and measurements. Our methods were able to identify and distinguish marginal eyespots from spots, as well as distinguish these patterns from less symmetrical patches of color. In addition, the measurements of an eyespots central area and surrounding rings were highly accurate.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
8
FWCI
0.72
Field percentile
top 34%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.