Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter?
D. Q. Truong, A. Guillen, M. Nooristani, M. Maheu, F. Champoux, A. Datta
Abstract
BackgroundGalvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) uses at least one electrode placed on the mastoid process with one or multiple placed over other head areas to stimulate the vestibular system. The exact electrode size used is not given much importance in the literature and has not been reported in several studies. In a previous study, we compared the clinical effects of using different electrode sizes (3 cm2 and 35 cm2) with placebo but with the same injected current, on postural control. We observed significant improvement using the smaller size electrode but not with the bigger size electrode. The goal of this study was to simulate the current flow patterns with the intent to shed light and potentially explain the experimental outcome. MethodsWe used an ultra-high-resolution structural dataset and developed a model to simulate the application of different electrode sizes. We considered current flow in the brain and in the vestibular labyrinth. ResultsOur simulation results verified the focality increase using smaller electrodes that we postulated as the main reason for our clinical effect. The use of smaller size electrodes in combination with the montage employed also result in higher induced electric field (E-field) in the brain. ConclusionsElectrode size and related current density is a critical parameter to characterize any GVS administration as the choice impacts the induced E-field. It is evident that the higher induced E-field likely contributed to the clinical outcome reported in our prior study.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation alters the sense of upright
Sofia Wöhrstein, Hans‐Otto Karnath·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2025
- Use of vestibular galvanic stimulation for correction of the position and of the gaze in a flight simulator.
R. Vega, J. Gordillo, … E. Soto·bioRxiv·May 22, 2020
- Vestibular involvement in transcranial electrical stimulation: body sway as a marker of unintended stimulation
Ilkka Laakso, Janita Nissi, Otto Kangasmaa·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Dec 22, 2024
- When Noise Isnt Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS)
Dominique Rice, Kelci B. Hannan, … Christopher J. Dakin·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2026
- Vagus nerve stimulation using an endovascular electrode array
Evan N. Nicolai, Jorge Arturo Larco, … Gregory A. Worrell·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2023
- Shared neural mechanisms between imagined and perceived egocentric motion - A combined GVS and fMRI study
Gianluca Macauda, Marius Moisa, … Bigna Lenggenhager·CortexPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2019