Leveraging correlations between polygenic risk score predictors to detect heterogeneity in GWAS cohorts
Jie YuaniD, Henry XingiD, Alexandre Louis Lamy, Todd LencziD, Itsik Pe’eriD
Abstract
Evidence from both GWAS and clinical observation has suggested that certain psychiatric, metabolic, and autoimmune diseases are heterogeneous, comprising multiple subtypes with distinct genomic etiologies and Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS). However, the presence of subtypes within many phenotypes is frequently unknown. We present CLiP (Correlated Liability Predictors), a method to detect heterogeneity in single GWAS cohorts. CLiP calculates a weighted sum of correlations between SNPs contributing to a PRS on the case/control liability scale. We demonstrate mathematically and through simulation that among i.i.d. homogeneous cases, significant anti-correlations are expected between otherwise independent predictors due to ascertainment on the hidden liability score. In the presence of heterogeneity from distinct etiologies, confounding by covariates, or mislabeling, these correlation patterns are altered predictably. We further extend our method to two additional association study designs: CLiP-X for quantitative predictors in applications such as transcriptome-wide association, and CLiP-Y for quantitative phenotypes, where there is no clear distinction between cases and controls. Through simulations, we demonstrate that CLiP and its extensions reliably distinguish between homogeneous and heterogeneous cohorts when the PRS explains as low as 5% of variance on the liability scale and cohorts comprise 50, 000 - 100, 000 samples, an increasingly practical size for modern GWAS. We apply CLiP to heterogeneity detection in schizophrenia cohorts totaling > 50, 000 cases and controls collected by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. We observe significant heterogeneity in mega-analysis of the combined PGC data (p-value 8.54e-4), as well as in individual cohorts meta-analyzed using Fishers method (p-value 0.03), based on significantly associated variants.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A comparison of ten polygenic score methods for psychiatric disorders applied across multiple cohorts
Guiyan Ni, Jian Zeng, … Vahram H. Haroutunian·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2021
- Penetrance and Pleiotropy of Polygenic Risk Scores for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression in the VA Health Care System
Tim B. Bigdeli, Georgios Voloudakis, … Panos Roussos·medRxiv·Feb 16, 2022
- Polygenic risk of psychiatric disorders exhibits cross-trait associations in electronic health record data
Rachel L. Kember, Alison K. Merikangas, … Maja Bućan·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2019
- Leveraging haplotype information in heritability estimation and polygenic prediction
Jonas Meisner, Michael E. Benros, Simon Rasmussen·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Transdiagnostic Polygenic Risk Models for Psychopathology and Comorbidity: Cross-Ancestry Analysis in the All of Us Research Program
Phil Hyoun Lee, Jae-Yoon Jung, … Andrew David Grotzinger·medRxiv·Mar 26, 2025
- Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 106,160 patients across four healthcare systems
Amanda B. Zheutlin, Jessica Kiri Dennis, … Jordan W. Smoller·American Journal of PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2019