bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Graphicacy across age, education, and culture: a new tool to assess intuitive graphics skills
L. Ciccione, M. Sable-Meyer, E. Boissin, M. Josserand, C. Potier-Watkins, S. Caparos, S. Dehaene
Abstract
Data plots are widely used in science, journalism and politics, since they efficiently allow to depict a large amount of information. Graphicacy, the ability to understand graphs, thus became a fundamental cultural skill. Here, we introduce a new measure of graphicacy that assesses the ability to detect a trend in noisy scatterplots ("does this graph go up or down?"). In 3943 educated participants, responses vary as a sigmoid function of the t-value that a statistician would compute to detect a significant trend. We find a minimum level of core graphicacy even in unschooled participants living in remote Namibian villages (N=87) and 6-year-old 1st-graders who never read a graph (N=27). However, the sigmoid slope (the "graphicacy index") varies across participants, increases with education, and tightly correlates with statistical knowledge, showing that experience contributes to refining graphical intuitions. Our tool is publicly available online and allows to quickly evaluate intuitive graphics skills. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCEThe rising cost of gas, the number of Covid deaths, the evolution of temperatures during the summer months: we often face graphs depicting these phenomena. The scientific literature has shown that human adults can intuit, within milliseconds, the statistical trend of these graphs. However, we do not know if these intuitions generalized to unschooled people and, most importantly, how to measure their variations in the population. In this study we show that intuitive graphics skills are present even in 6-year-old children who never saw a graph and in the Himba of Namibia, an indigenous people with no access to formal schooling. Furthermore, we developed a quantitative assessment of such intuitive graphics skills (which we called the "graphicacy index"), that everyone can easily obtain for free, through a short (10 minutes) online test: https://neurospin-data.cea.fr/exp/lorenzo-ciccione/graphicacy-index/. In summary, our study provides the first attempt to formally quantify human intuitions of statistical graphs.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The baboon as a statistician: Can non-human primates perform linear regression on a graph?
Lorenzo Ciccione, Thomas Dighiero-Brecht, … Stanislas Dehaene·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2024
- Generalization as diffusion: human function learning on graphs
C. M. Wu, E. Schulz, S. J. Gershman·bioRxiv·May 10, 2019
- Shared and individual tuning curves for social perception
Rekha S. Varrier, Zishan Su, … Emily S. Finn·Open MindPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Visual orientation discrimination skills are tightly linked with specific aspects of human intelligence
Kyriaki Mikellidou, Nefeli Lambrou, … Marios N. Avraamides·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2023
- Which way is the bookstore? A closer look at the judgments of relative directions task.
D. J. Huffman, A. D. Ekstrom·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2018
- Do long-tailed macaques engage in intuitive statistics?
Sarah Placì, Johanna Eckert, … Julia Fischer·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2018