Elephants inhabiting two forested sites in western Uganda exhibit contrasting patterns of species identity, density, and history of hybridization
Claire K. Goodfellow, Daniella E. ChusydiD, Savanah R. Bird, Dennis BabaasaiD, Colin A. ChapmaniD, Jena R. HickeyiD, Mireille JohnsoniD, Charles KayijamaheiD, Richard Mutegeki, Patrick A. OmejaiD, Charles TumwesigyeiD, Eustrate UzabahoiD, Samuel K. WasseriD, Michael D. WassermaniD, Caitlin P. WellsiD, Nelson TingiD
Abstract
Elephant populations across much of Africa face severe rates of decline due to poaching and habitat loss. The recent decision by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to separately list African forest (Loxodonta cyclotis) and savanna (L. africana) elephants on the IUCN Red List both highlights the different threats of extinction faced by these two species and emphasizes the need for genetic data to classify taxonomically undefined populations across the continent. This includes western Uganda - a region that harbors the largest known modern hybrid zone between the two species. We combined a new high-throughput amplicon sequencing (HTAS) approach with fecal DNA-based Capture Mark Recapture (CMR) analysis to infer the population sizes and species compositions of elephants living in two forests. We demonstrate that Kibale National Park hosts a relatively large elephant population (573 individuals, 95% CI: 410 to 916; 0.72 elephants/km2) composed primarily of hybrids (81.5%) and savanna elephants (17.7%), while Bwindi Impenetrable National Park hosts a smaller population (96 individuals, 95% CI: 64 to 145; 0.29 elephants/km2) composed of forest elephants (86.8%) and hybrids (13.2%). We then sequenced maternally inherited (mtDNA) and paternally inherited (AMELY) genetic markers and found that the two parks populations exhibit different patterns of sex-linked genetic variation. The contrasting patterns of species identity and genetic variation between these parks demonstrate different histories of hybridization and highlight the importance of site-specific monitoring where elephants are taxonomically undefined.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Incipient signs of genetic differentiation among African elephant populations in fragmenting miombo ecosystems in south-western Tanzania
A. L. Lobora, C. L. Nahonyo, … L. S. Eggert·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2017
- Serial colonization shapes genetic variation and defines conservation units in Asian elephants
A. Khan, M. Sil, … U. Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2023
- Population Structure and Ecology of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana, Blumenbach, 1797) in Chebera Churchura National Park, Ethiopia.
A. T. Tsegaye, A. S. Bekele, A. G. Atikem·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2022
- Abundance, density, and social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in a human-modified landscape in southwestern Gabon
Colin M. Brand, Mireille Johnson, … Nelson Ting·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2020
- Cascading effects of elephant-human interactions in a savanna ecosystem and the implications for ecology and conservation
D. Western, V. N. Mose·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2021
- Group size constraints may mask underlying similarities in social structure: a comparison of female elephant societies
N. Shetty, P. Keerthipriya, T. N. C. Vidya·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2017