bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Equivalent volitional learning emerges through circuit-specific population dynamics in motor cortex and hippocampus
Andres de VicenteiD, Catalin MitelutiD, Renan Augusto Viana MendesiD, Lorenzo Marianelli, Mariona Colomer-RoselliD, David B. BrückneriD, Giampiero BardellaiD, Flavio DonatoiD
Abstract
Learning operates across different brain circuits to associate population activity patterns with desired outcomes, and to enable volitional reactivation of those patterns to control behavior. These circuits differ profoundly in their architecture and dynamical regimes, yet which features of learning are shared across them and which arise from circuit-specific implementations remains unknown. Here, we use a brain-computer interface (BCI) to train mice to modulate the activity of selected neuronal ensembles toward configurations that trigger reward delivery. By making reward delivery contingent directly on population activity, we impose an identical associative learning problem on two circuits with distinct dynamical regimes: the primary motor cortex (M1) and the hippocampal area CA3. Mice acquired robust volitional control in both regions, and learning produced a set of shared signatures across circuits, including modulation of reward-controlling neurons, network-level sparsification, and greater exploration of reward-related activity patterns. These signatures were underpinned by distinct population dynamics: M1 activity flowed continuously through reward-associated states, whereas CA3 activity traced approach-and-return dynamics around them. Recurrent network models endowed with distinct minimal connectivity constraints chosen to reflect the dominant dynamical regime associated with each region captured key features of these shared signatures and region-specific dynamics, indicating that local architectural constraints are sufficient to account for the distinct implementations of learning. These findings indicate that equivalent learning outcomes arise from divergent dynamical implementations across architecturally distinct circuits. This principled degeneracy reveals that learning is not a single canonical solution, but is implemented through multiple circuit-specific mechanisms shaped by local network architecture.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neuronal activity and learning in local cortical networks are modulated by the action-perception state
Ben Engelhard, Ran Darshan, … Eilon Vaadia·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2019
- Selective modulation of population dynamics during neuroprosthetic skill learning
Ellen L. Zippi, Albert K. You, … Jose M. Carmena·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2021
- Feedback control of recurrent circuits imposes dynamical constraints on learning
Harsha Gurnani, Weixuan Liu, Bingni W. Brunton·bioRxiv·May 24, 2024
- Diverse operant control of different motor cortex populations during learning
Nuria Vendrell-Llopis, Ching Fang, … Jose M. Carmena·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2022
- Functional reorganization of motor cortex connectivity during learning
Kayvon Daie, Kyle Aitken, … Karel Svoboda·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2026
- Entorhinal cortex directs learning-related changes in CA1 representations
Christine Grienberger, Jeffrey C. Magee·NaturePeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2022