Imputation and polygenic score performances of human genotyping arrays in diverse populations
Dat NguyeniD, Trang TraniD, Mai TraniD, Khai Trieu TraniD, Duy T. PhamiD, Nguyễn Thùy DươngiD, Quan Hoang NguyeniD, Nam S. VoiD
Abstract
Regardless of the overwhelming use of next-generation sequencing technologies, microarray-based genotyping combined with the imputation of untyped variants remains a cost-effective means to interrogate genetic variations across the human genome. This technology is widely used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) at bio-bank scales, and more recently, in polygenic score (PGS) analysis to predict and to stratify disease risk. Over the last decade, human genotyping arrays have undergone a tremendous growth in both number, and content making a comprehensive evaluation of their performances became more important. Here, we performed a comprehensive performance assessment for 23 available human genotyping arrays in 6 ancestry groups using diverse public, and in-house datasets. The analyses focus on performance estimation of derived imputation (in terms of accuracy and coverage) and PGS (in term of concordance to PGS estimated from whole genome sequencing data) in three different traits and diseases. We found that the arrays with a higher number of SNPs are not necessarily the ones with higher imputation performance, but the arrays that are well-optimized for the targeted population could provide very good imputation performance. In addition, PGS estimated by imputed SNP array data is highly correlated to PGS estimated by whole genome sequencing data in most of cases. When optimal arrays are used, the correlations of key PGS metrics between two types of data can be higher than 0.97, but interestingly, arrays with high density can result in lower PGS performance. Our results suggest the importance of properly selecting a suitable genotyping array for PGS applications. Finally, we developed a web tool that provide interactive analyses of tag SNP contents and imputation performance based on population and genomic regions of interest. This study would act as a practical guide for researchers to design their genotyping arrays-based studies. The tool is available at: https://genome.vinbigdata.org/tools/saa/
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Low-pass sequencing increases the power of GWAS and decreases measurement error of polygenic risk scores compared to genotyping arrays
Jeremiah H. Li, Chase A. Mazur, … Joseph K. Pickrell·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Imputation and polygenic score performance of low coverage whole-genome sequencing and genotyping arrays in diverse human populations
Phi Truong Nguyen, Vy Nguyen, … Thuy Duong Ho Huynh·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2025
- Causal variant capture in genotype discovery approaches drives polygenic prediction performance across traits and populations
Yi-Sian Lin, Taotao Tan, … Elizabeth G. Atkinson·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2025
- Low coverage whole genome sequencing enables accurate assessment of common variants and calculation of genome-wide polygenic scores
Julian R. Homburger, Cynthia L. Neben, … Amit V. Khera·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2019
- The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population
Hagai Levi, Ran Elkon, Ron Shamir A·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2024
- Imputation-Based Genomic Coverage Assessments of Current Genotyping Arrays: Illumina HumanCore, OmniExpress, Multi-Ethnic global array and sub-arrays, Global Screening Array, Omni2.5M, Omni5M, and Affymetrix UK Biobank
Sarah C. Nelson, Jane Romm, … Cathy C. Laurie·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2017