Behavioral EcologyAnimal Behavior & CognitionPeer-reviewed journal article
Learning to handle flowers increases pollen collection benefits for bees but does not affect pollination success for plants
Maggie M. Mayberry, Katherine C. Naumer, Annaliese N Novinger, Dalton M. McCart, Rachel V. WilkinsiD, Haley Muse, Tia‐Lynn AshmaniD, Avery L. RusselliD
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Abstract
Behavior frequently affects cooperation as well as conflict in plant-pollinator interactions. Pollinators such as bees often modify how they handle flowers with experience and such learning is generally assumed to increase collection of floral food rewards. The complexity of flower morphology also affects how quickly pollinators learn and recall how to access floral rewards from a given flower type. Because learning to handle a flower can increase extraction of food rewards (such as pollen) and often involves the pollinator altering how it interacts with the flowers reproductive organs, pollinator learning could affect pollination success. Yet how pollinator cognition and flower morphology interact to affect pollination success is unknown. We therefore asked how learning and memory of flower handling by pollen-foraging generalist bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) varied among four morphologically distinct flower types (Phacelia campanularia, Exacum affine, Solanum elaeagnifolium, and Erythranthe guttata) and affected pollen collection and pollen deposition on these flowers. We found that bees learned and remembered how to handle some flower types more quickly than others. Learning typically involved development of motor routines unique to each flower type. While bees invariably learned to improve pollen collection, how quickly bees learned and remembered each flower type did not affect pollen collection. Surprisingly, pollen deposition on flowers was not affected by bee foraging experience. Thus, even though learning benefits the bee, it does not alter female (and potentially male) fitness benefits for the plant. We discuss potential reasons for these patterns and consequences for bee behavior and flower evolution.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Take it or leaf it: bees learn leaf shape as a cue when flower color is easily learned
Anthony Moth T. Castagna, Jenny K. Burrow, … Avery L. Russell·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2026
- Inexperienced bumble bees are poor at securely landing regardless of flower orientation or presence of labellum
Shannon R. McWaters, Stefan Popp, … Anna Dornhaus·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2024
- Nutrient learning, perception and generalization differ among wild pollinator species
A. L. Pietrantuono, V. Fernanndez-Arhex, … F. Requier·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2023
- The influence of bee movements on patterns of pollen transfer between plants: an exploratory model
Juliane Mailly, Thomas Besognet, … Louise Riotte‐Lambert·Integrative and Comparative BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2025
- No decoy effect in bees: rewardless flowers do not increase bumblebees' preference for neighbouring flowers
Mélissa Armand, Leonhard Herrnberger, … Tomer J. Czaczkes·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2025
- Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees
Mélissa Armand, Christoph Beckenbauer, … Tomer J. Czaczkes·Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2025