Nutrient learning, perception and generalization differ among wild pollinator species
A. L. Pietrantuono, V. Fernanndez-Arhex, J.-C. Sandoz, F. Requier
Abstract
Learning is the process through which skills, knowledge, behaviors are acquired and developed. Through life experiences, pollinator insects, learn to associate odor or visual stimuli from flowers with a rewarding food as pollen or nectar. This capability allows them to obtain resources efficiently and provides a valuable pollination service. Here, we compared the learning capability among different wild pollinator insects by mean of experiments based on the recent Free-Moving Proboscis Extension Response (FMPER) technique. Specifically, we evaluated the process of perception, learning and generalization between pollen enriched with different concentrations of fatty acid (which play a critical role in the survival, development and reproduction of many animals). We compared the associative learning in two castes of bumble bees (queens and workers of Bombus terrestris), honey bees (Apis mellifera), solitary bees (Ruizanthedella mutabilis) and non-bee pollinator species (the hoverfly Eristalis tenax). Our results reveal that learning performances differed among bumble bee social castes, with queens acquiring learning odorants more effectively than workers. Likewise, learning performances differed among the four species of insect pollinators. Honey bees acquired odor-sucrose association more rapidly than the other species. Likewise, bumble bees learned better than the solitary bee species and the hoverfly. The pattern of generalization among odorant stimuli as also different among the studied species, with honey bees showing stronger generalization and hoverflies showing more specific response patterns. Studying the learning behavior in insect pollinators provides valuable information for the conservation of these species and services they provide, through adapted pollinator-friendly schemes matching their behavioral performances.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Foraging task specialization in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the contribution of floral rewards on the learning performance of pollen and nectar foragers
- Learning to handle flowers increases pollen collection benefits for bees but does not affect pollination success for plants
Maggie M. Mayberry, Katherine C. Naumer, … Avery L. Russell·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Bumblebees learn to use peripheral taste to predict the presence of nectar in flowers
Michael J. M. Harrap, Rachel H. Parkinson, … Geraldine A. Wright·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Take it or leaf it: bees learn leaf shape as a cue when flower color is easily learned
Anthony Moth T. Castagna, Jenny K. Burrow, … Avery L. Russell·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2026
- Flexible visual learning and memory in nectar foraging hornets
M. Lacombrade, M. D. Bajo, … M. Lihoreau·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2023
- Octopamine affects gustatory responsiveness and associative learning performance in bumble bees
F. Muth, E. Breslow, A. S. Leonard·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2022