Social status and previous experience in the group as predictors of long-term welfare of sows housed in large semi-static groups
Abstract
Mixing gestating sows implies hierarchy formation and has detrimental consequences on welfare. The effects of social stress on the most vulnerable individuals may be underestimated and it is therefore important to evaluate welfare between individuals within groups. This study aimed at investigating the impact of social status and previous experience in the group on well-being of sows housed in large semi-static groups (20 groups of 46-91 animals). We assessed aggression (d0 (mixing), d2, d27, d29), body lesions (d1, d26, d84) and feeding order. Social status was based on the proportion of fights won during a 6-hr observation period between d0 and d2. Dominants (29%) were those who won more fights than they lost, Subdominants (25%) won fewer fights than they lost, Losers (23%) never won any fight in which they were involved while Avoiders (23%) were never involved in fights. Resident sows (70%) were already present in the group in the previous gestation while New sows (30%) were newly introduced at mixing. Subdominants and Dominants were highly involved in fights around mixing but this was more detrimental for Subdominants than Dominants, Losers and Avoiders since they had the highest body lesion scores at mixing. Avoiders received less non-reciprocal agonistic acts than Losers on d2 (P=0.0001) and had the lowest body lesion scores after mixing. However, Avoiders and Losers were more at risk in the long-term since they had the highest body lesions scores at d26 and d84. They were followed by Subdominants and then Dominants. New sows fought more (P<0.0001), tended to be involved in longer fights (P=0.075) around mixing and had more body lesions throughout gestation than Resident sows. Feeding order from one-month post-mixing was influenced both by the previous experience in the group and social status (P<0.0001). New sows, especially with a low social status, are more vulnerable throughout gestation and could serve as indicators of non-optimal conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of periodic group housing opportunities on reproductive performance and welfare in sows
Tomoya Shimasaki, Ken‐ichi Yayou, … Ken’ichi Takeda·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- What it takes to be at the top: The interrelationship between chronic social stress and social dominance
Merima Šabanović, He Liu, … Dipesh Chaudhury·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2020
- Salivary oxytocin co-varies with parturition and nursing behavior in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus)
L. R. Moscovice, B. Sobczak, … E. Kanitz·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2021
- History of winning and hierarchy landscape influence stress susceptibility in mice
Katherine B. LeClair, Kenny L. Chan, … Scott J. Russo·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2021
- Responses of dairy cows following a change in housing system and social group: a living lab experiment
Catherine Arpin, Marjorie Cellier, … E. Vasseur·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2026
- Rank- and Threat-Dependent Social Modulation of Innate Defensive Behaviors
Ling-yun Li, Xinjian Gao, … Ya-tang Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2026